- From: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:18:38 +0200
- To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4676E89E.1010101@iaik.tugraz.at>
Dear all, I do not think that XMLDSig is the right place to perform DNAME constraining, canonicalization or comparison. Usually RFC 2253/4514 implementations will parse two string representations and rather use means as specified in RFC 4517 section 4 to compare two values. However I would agree giving input to the IETF as these specifications are located in their premises. Such input could essentially ask for a canonical string representation for DNAMEs. That would be really nice and such a DNAME comparison could then be reduced to a simple string comparison. ;-) Konrad Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote: > > Dear all, > > I understood in our last conference call that Frederick suggested to > summarize the issues related to the RFC 2253 stuff within XMLSig. > > In addition to the RFC 2253 encoding stuff that we have been > discussing in a separated thread, and which has been summarized by > Thomas, who has raised a proposal last week, I would like to remind an > issue that I raised in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0021.html > > > and that was commented by Ed in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0024.html > > > This issue deals with the fact that both RFC 2253 and RFC 4514 make it > clear that the String representation using short names and string > values for for representing DNs may put problems when trying to > identifying without ambiguity the corresponding certificate... > > Could we deal with this, once we have agreed on the encoding issue? > > Regards > > Juan Carlos. > -- Konrad Lanz, IAIK/SIC - Graz University of Technology Inffeldgasse 16a, 8010 Graz, Austria Tel: +43 316 873 5547 Fax: +43 316 873 5520 https://www.iaik.tugraz.at/aboutus/people/lanz http://jce.iaik.tugraz.at Certificate chain (including the EuroPKI root certificate): https://europki.iaik.at/ca/europki-at/cert_download.htm
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 20:18:52 UTC