- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:52:41 -0400
- To: XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
- Cc: Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
6 June, 9-10am Eastern Time (6-7am Pacific, 1400-1500 Dublin, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete) See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html> for time in other time zones. Zakim Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC') IRC Chat: irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec Web-based IRC (member-only): <http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi> Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair. Chair: Frederick Hirsch Regrets: none 1) Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting Konrad Lanz is scheduled to scribe. The current scribe list is at the end of this message. Scribe Instructions: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html Next meeting: Tuesday 12 June. Scribe: ?? 2) Review and approval of last meeting's minutes http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-xmlsec-minutes 3) Action item review Open actions are listed in Tracker at http://www.w3.org/2007/ xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open Note, action items should only be closed in Tracker during WG meeting as they are agreed as closed. When completing an action, the owner should send an email to the public xmlsec mailing list stating the resolution of the action and that it should be closed, and should refer to "ACTION-<number>" in the message so the message is linked to the tracker notes for that action. The owner should NOT close the issue in tracker at that time. Action 26 : draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG, Thomas Roessler ? Action 28: Propose additional types of contributions for workshop CFP, Hal Lockhart Closed - no proposal to be provided. Action 34: Verify that CR version of C14N11 has no conformance- affecting changes against http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml- c14n11-20061220/ , Konrad Lanz Agenda item 7. Action 35: Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Rich Salz Agenda item 6a. Action 36 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Juan Carlos Cruellas Agenda item 6a. Action 37 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Sean Mullan Agenda item 6a. Action 38 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Ed Simon Agenda item 6a. Action 39 Update editor's draft according to http://lists.w3.org/ Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0042.html, Thomas Roessler Done, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 0002.html Action 40 Contact CAO Yongsheng confirming treatment of E1 in Decryption Transform, Konrad Lanz Agenda item 5. Action 41, Check his implementation wrt DNAME erratum, Sean Mullan Agenda item 8a. Action 42, Produce example for breakage due to current E01 language, Juan Carlos Cruellas Agenda item 8a. Action 43, to produce example for breakage due to current E01 language, Konrad Lanz Agenda item 8a. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/ 0041.html 4) Workshop/CFP Current state of CFP, including timeline: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html 4a) Proposed changes to CFP, Frederick Hirsch http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/ 0000.html 4b) Confirm workshop logistics: 25 & 26 September, 9-5, BEA, San Jose. Action to create logistics web page. 4c) Other workshop issues. Plan for W3C review next Wednesday before publication. 5) Decryption Transform to Last Call Current draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt.html Bring this draft to Last Call (as proposed in last week's teleconference) with updated namespace URI. No review comments noted on mailing list. Updated namespace URIs (member only): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/ 0036.html Wait on Action 40? Contact CAO Yongsheng confirming treatment of E1 in Decryption Transform, Konrad Lanz 6) C14N11 Review Draft : http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509.htm CR transition request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml- core-wg/2007May/0040 6a) merge path, C14N11 Appendix issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/ 0044.html , Konrad Lanz Action 35: Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Rich Salz Action 36 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Juan Carlos Cruellas Action 37 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Sean Mullan Action 38 Review Konrad's message re xml:base by next call, Ed Simon Next steps? 7) Algorithm URIs; dsig-usage note ACTION-34 Konrad to verify that CR version of C14N11 has no conformance-affecting changes against http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/ If we are satisfied that the Last Call draft of C14N11 is conformance-wise equivalent to the CR, then I propose that we use the algorithm Identifiers that were defined in this note: http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/ Otherwise, I propose to obtain new algorithm identifiers for the CR version of C14N11. In both cases, I propose to arrange for an update of said note. 8) Editorial review - XML Signature Current draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/ http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/changes.html 8a) Errata 01 (Distinguished Name) issue http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xmldsig-errata#E01 Current edit to section 4.4.4 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/#sec-X509Data Current proposal to section Action 41, Check his implementation wrt DNAME erratum, Sean Mullan Action 42, Produce example for breakage due to current E01 language, Juan Carlos Cruellas Action 43, to produce example for breakage due to current E01 language, Konrad Lanz http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/ 0041.html 9) Interop testing, participation expectations Some material in this agenda item might be member confidential. Review interop testing expectations: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-interest/results 10) Test cases i) Regression tests - original XML Signature and Decryption Transform cases Action to review and summarize? ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated) <http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509> iii) E01 - see ACTION-19 Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for E02-E05 iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64 URI? Test exists but not well-defined? v) Action to summarize dditional tests? greg: test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake <hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is present <hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present <fjh> thomas: generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11 as final transform <fjh> greg: new generators not rely on default c14n <klanz2> Test case for conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData: <klanz2> Use case: Generate a signature having a reference with some xpath transform selecting NodeSetData <klanz2> then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs OctetStreamData <klanz2> Check on verification: if the resulting signature actually made the use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms 11) Any other business 12) Adjourn Scribe list ----------- Elisabetta Carrara Donald Eastlake Konrad Lanz Peter Lipp Hal Lockhart Ram Mohan Anthony Nadalin Chris Nautiyal Rich Salz Daniel Schutzer Ed Simon Andrew Sullivan Panagiotis Trimintzios Tarun Tyagi Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07) Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am) Rob Miller (F2F 2 May 07 pm) Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am) Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm) Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007) Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007) Giles Hogben (29 May 2007) regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 16:53:15 UTC