- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:21:04 -0700
- To: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>
- Cc: XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
On 2007-06-25 23:29:05 +0200, Konrad Lanz wrote: >>> * We should consider referencing RFC 2253 and also RFC 4514 (after >>> checking if they are no collateral effects). >> So updated in the Editor's Draft. > Can we be sure there aren't any problems by simply changing to > RFC 4514 ? I'd hesitate to change this until we are entirely > sure. After reviewing the "changes" appendix of 4514, and the body of normative text in the RFC, I seem to have convinced myself that the change is harmless. However, I'd welcome a second pair of eyes, so you're welcome to do your own comparison. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:21:06 UTC