Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. from Juan Carlos Cruellas on 2007-06-26 (public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org from June 2007)

From: Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:42:20 +0200
To: Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>, Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4680D16C.40109@ac.upc.edu>

Certainly the charter says that the group may develop a best practices 
w3c note... do you think that we should at least discuss the feasibility 
of producing it?

Juan Carlos.
Thomas Roessler escribió:
> On 2007-06-19 11:30:35 +0200, Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote:
>
>   
>> I would say that at least we could think of including within
>> XMLSig some warning on these issues....
>>     
>
> To me, that sounds like excellent input to the best practices
> deliverable.
>
> Cheers,
>

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 08:42:36 UTC