Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51)

Richard Salz wrote:

> As for the specific issue 
> of \20, the opinion was if that if W3C removes it, WSI would change things 
> if necessary on their side.  (Since it's not a conformance requirement, 
> it's not clear if any changes would be needed on their side.)

But isn't MUST a conformance requirement? Sorry, I'm not familiar with 
the WSI requirements.

--Sean

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 17:49:01 UTC