public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from September 2008 by thread

[closed] Re: p:encrypt and p:decrypt Norman Walsh (Monday, 29 September)

Re: XProc comment Norman Walsh (Sunday, 28 September)

Another look at validate-with-xml-schema Vasil Rangelov (Sunday, 28 September)

Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema James Garriss (Friday, 26 September)

XProc Minutes 25 September 2008 Norman Walsh (Thursday, 25 September)

p:validate-with-schematron report defect Florent Georges (Wednesday, 24 September)

LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 24 September)

LCWD comments from XML Query and XSL WGs Andrew Eisenberg (Monday, 22 September)

p:wrap and group-adjacent Norman Walsh (Sunday, 21 September)

simple rewording in 2.1 Steps James Fuller (Saturday, 20 September)

sync p:option and p:with-option James Fuller (Friday, 19 September)

Re: clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1. Norman Walsh (Thursday, 18 September)

[closed] Re: p:pipe convention Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)

[closed] Re: foreign namespaces Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)

[closed] Re: what about option values on directly invoked p:declare-step Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)

[closed] Re: more PSVI Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)

[closed] Re: rdf accommodation Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)

justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri Dan Connolly (Thursday, 11 September)

determining an xproc extension attributes James Fuller (Monday, 1 September)

Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC