- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:35:14 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 12:35:58 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > The way group-adjacent is currently spec'd, it can only work for elements. > > Should we should fix that, or should we make it a dynamic error if a > none-element node is matched when group-adjacent is specified? This thread is subsumed by a proposal made to resolve LC2 issue 016. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Our years, our debts, and our enemies http://nwalsh.com/ | are always more numerous than we | imagine.--Charles Nodier
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 12:35:58 UTC