- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:05:52 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes: > >> consider the following contrived example; > [...] >> could we not omit the step attribute on the p:pipe to default mean >> 'this' step e.g. the local step ? > > The WG considered this kind of "shortcut" but concluded that defining > one kind of default for a missing p:input and another kind of default > for missing attributes on a p:pipe would just be too confusing. > The WG is not motivated to revisit this issue at this time, we are > satisfied by the status quo. > If you find this resolution unsatisfactory, please let us know. In the spirit of moving the spec to a recommendation, yes of course fine with this ... will leave an opportunity to improve such things in future versions. cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:06:28 UTC