- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:39:51 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:10 UTC
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> writes: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 09:03 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: > [...] >> Does this justification satisfy you? > > Yes, that works. Thank you, Dan. And thanks for catching this detail in the spec. I've made the changes, you can see them in the latest editor's draft starting at http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#f.base-uri If you're unsatisfied with this resolution, please let us know. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In science, "fact" can only mean http://nwalsh.com/ | "confirmed to such a degree that it | would be perverse to withhold | provisional assent." I suppose that | apples might start to rise tomorrow, | but the possibility does not merit | equal time in physics | classrooms.--Stephen J. Gould
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:52:10 UTC