- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:54:52 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
consider this a blanket 'yes, its fine' to past few emails today. thx, J On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > [...] >> I've attempted to address this issue by rewording 2.10 and the corresponding >> section for Variables so that the specifics are left to the syntax sections. >> I've also made it explicit that the value of each must be either a string >> or an xs:untypedAtomic. > > The WG concluded that this was sufficient. > > Please let me know if this resolves your concerns. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Oh well, no matter what happens, > http://nwalsh.com/ | there's always death.-- Napoleon >
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC