W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [closed] Re: sync p:option and p:with-option

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:54:52 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0809290954y45db750aobdd02b39e9eb5a7e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

consider this a blanket 'yes, its fine' to past few emails today.

thx, J

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> [...]
>> I've attempted to address this issue by rewording 2.10 and the corresponding
>> section for Variables so that the specifics are left to the syntax sections.
>> I've also made it explicit that the value of each must be either a string
>> or an xs:untypedAtomic.
>
> The WG concluded that this was sufficient.
>
> Please let me know if this resolves your concerns.
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Oh well, no matter what happens,
> http://nwalsh.com/            | there's always death.-- Napoleon
>
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:41:08 UTC