- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:00:06 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Jim, > > Since I think you're paying attention to XProc at the moment :-), could > you consider this proposal and let us know what you think? yes, I been away for a few weeks, yes this resolves my concerns. regards, Jim Fuller > > ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: > >> James Fuller writes: >> >>> I agree with both yours and Mohamed point ... and yes I have read >>> these sections a few times and understand how things are supposed to >>> work; I still think there is a contradiction between the 2 sections I >>> quoted. >> >> The WG proposes to change 'recognize' to 'implement' in section 3.8 -- >> would that remove the contradiction you see? If not, please suggest >> what would do so. >> >> Thanks, >> >> ht >> -- >> Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh >> Half-time member of W3C Team >> 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 >> Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk >> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ >> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Do not seek to follow in the footsteps > http://nwalsh.com/ | of men of old; seek what they > | sought.--Matsuo Basho >
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:00:41 UTC