public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from September 2008 by subject

[closed] Re: clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.

[closed] Re: determining an xproc extension attributes

[closed] Re: foreign namespaces

[closed] Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri

[closed] Re: more PSVI

[closed] Re: p:encrypt and p:decrypt

[closed] Re: p:pipe convention

[closed] Re: p:wrap and group-adjacent

[closed] Re: rdf accommodation

[closed] Re: simple rewording in 2.1 Steps

[closed] Re: sync p:option and p:with-option

[closed] Re: what about option values on directly invoked p:declare-step

Another look at validate-with-xml-schema

clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.

determining an xproc extension attributes

justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri

LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron

LCWD comments from XML Query and XSL WGs

p:validate-with-schematron report defect

p:wrap and group-adjacent

Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema

simple rewording in 2.1 Steps

sync p:option and p:with-option

XProc comment

XProc Minutes 25 September 2008

Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC