[closed] Re: clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.
[closed] Re: determining an xproc extension attributes
[closed] Re: foreign namespaces
[closed] Re: justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri
[closed] Re: more PSVI
[closed] Re: p:encrypt and p:decrypt
[closed] Re: p:pipe convention
[closed] Re: p:wrap and group-adjacent
[closed] Re: rdf accommodation
[closed] Re: simple rewording in 2.1 Steps
[closed] Re: sync p:option and p:with-option
[closed] Re: what about option values on directly invoked p:declare-step
Another look at validate-with-xml-schema
clarify the difference of usage of p:input in section 5.1.1.
determining an xproc extension attributes
justify or remove aliases: base-uri, resolve-uri
- Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Norman Walsh (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Jeni Tennison (Monday, 15 September)
- Dan Connolly (Monday, 15 September)
- Henry S. Thompson (Monday, 15 September)
- Dan Connolly (Monday, 15 September)
- Jeni Tennison (Monday, 15 September)
- Henry S. Thompson (Monday, 15 September)
- Dan Connolly (Friday, 12 September)
- mozer (Friday, 12 September)
- Dan Connolly (Thursday, 11 September)
LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron
LCWD comments from XML Query and XSL WGs
p:validate-with-schematron report defect
p:wrap and group-adjacent
Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema
simple rewording in 2.1 Steps
sync p:option and p:with-option
XProc comment
XProc Minutes 25 September 2008
Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55:32 UTC