- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:33:48 +0100
- To: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It would help me understand your proposal if you would explain how the current definition fails to meet your needs -- with the default of 'true' for assert-valid, doesn't the existing step do what you want? ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFI3WNMkjnJixAXWBoRArC8AJ9UZmPdSPxnmv4ZO5gvlMLqeG7LbwCdG+zA xV8U9lrNTMvWZPlEc8eYtTY= =05gM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 26 September 2008 22:34:33 UTC