- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:21:44 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 14:22:27 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: [...] > I've attempted to address this issue by rewording 2.10 and the corresponding > section for Variables so that the specifics are left to the syntax sections. > I've also made it explicit that the value of each must be either a string > or an xs:untypedAtomic. The WG concluded that this was sufficient. Please let me know if this resolves your concerns. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Oh well, no matter what happens, http://nwalsh.com/ | there's always death.-- Napoleon
Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 14:22:27 UTC