W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > September 2008

Re: p:wrap and group-adjacent

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:42:01 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60809202042y5c524b38r1736d70cd72529c5@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

Norm,

I think this could be seen as a side effect of # ACTION-2008-08-28-03:
Norm to review the kinds of nodes that are legal for all steps.

Regards

Xmlizer

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> The way group-adjacent is currently spec'd, it can only work for elements.
>
> Should we should fix that, or should we make it a dynamic error if a
> none-element node is matched when group-adjacent is specified?
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is nothing which human courage
> http://nwalsh.com/            | will not undertake, and little that
>                              | human patience will not endure.--Dr.
>                              | Johnson
>
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2008 03:42:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:41:08 UTC