public-ws-chor@w3.org from December 2003 by date

Friday, 19 December 2003

• Editorials and comments on the requirements doc Tony Fletcher

Thursday, 18 December 2003

• WS-CAF presentation at current face-to-face Mark Little
• Contribution on adding explicit transaction demarcation to the WS-Choreography language Mark Little

Wednesday, 17 December 2003

• Link from translation site John Snow
• Link from translation site John Snow
• FW: WS-Chor Requirements Revised figures Tony Fletcher
• Comments on the model Gary Brown
• Overview comments from Steve RT Steve Ross-Talbot
• BPSS overview slides from Monica Tony Fletcher
• Fwd: Issues Process Steve Ross-Talbot

Monday, 15 December 2003

• Contribution on adding explicit transaction demarcation to the WS-Choreography language Tony Fletcher

Wednesday, 10 December 2003

• RE: Defining Business Process Fusion JC Reddy
• Defining Business Process Fusion Howard N Smith
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• Clarification of the Instance-Set use case. marco.adragna@oxfordsociety.org
• Business Process Fusion JC Reddy

Monday, 8 December 2003

• RE: WS Choreography Model Overview Ugo Corda
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process JC Reddy
• Re: WS Choreography Model Overview Nickolas Kavantzas
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process JC Reddy
• RE: WS Choreography Model Overview Burdett, David

Saturday, 6 December 2003

• Re: WS Choreography Model Overview Jim Hendler
• WS Choreography Model Overview Nickolas Kavantzas
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Edwin Khodabakchian
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Assaf Arkin

Friday, 5 December 2003

• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Assaf Arkin
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process JC Reddy
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Edwin Khodabakchian
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process JC Reddy
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Jeff Mischkinsky

Thursday, 4 December 2003

• RE: Question about capturing states explicitly in BPEL/BPML Ugo Corda
• Question about capturing states explicitly in BPEL/BPML JC Reddy
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Andrew Berry

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Jean-Jacques Dubray
• Re: Choreography semantics and WSDL Assaf Arkin
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Assaf Arkin
• Canonical Business Process Examples JC Reddy
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Jean-Jacques Dubray
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Champion, Mike
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Greg Meredith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Assaf Arkin
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Jean-Jacques Dubray
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Burdett, David
• Re: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology Assaf Arkin
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Assaf Arkin
• RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology Harvey Reed
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Monica J. Martin
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Ugo Corda
• RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology Harvey Reed
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Ugo Corda
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Monica J. Martin
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Ugo Corda
• Federated Processes and BPMS Topology Howard N Smith
• Re: Convergence of Standards - Fun - Phase 2 Was: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Andrew Berry
• Convergence of Standards - Fun - Phase 2 Was: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Steve Ross-Talbot
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Jean-Jacques Dubray
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Jean-Jacques Dubray
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Steve Ross-Talbot
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Andrew Berry
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Burdett, David
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Burdett, David
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Assaf Arkin
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Burdett, David
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Jean-Jacques Dubray
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Ugo Corda
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Jean-Jacques Dubray
• Choreography semantics and WSDL Ugo Corda

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Haugen Robert
• Fwd: Licensing lssues for Small Vendors Howard N Smith
• Re: Introduction section Monica J. Martin
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process Howard N Smith
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Assaf Arkin

Monday, 1 December 2003

• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Burdett, David
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography Jean-Jacques Dubray
• Re: Semantics and choreographies Monica J. Martin
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Steve Ross-Talbot

Monday, 17 November 2003

• Re: New Paper available for PDF download: Workflow is just a Pi process (or WFM is not BPM) Howard N Smith

Monday, 1 December 2003

• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context Burdett, David

Last message date: Monday, 22 December 2003 00:38:49 UTC