- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:38:36 +0000
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
- Message-Id: <2BB06D96-307D-11D8-9FA4-000393D13C9A@enigmatec.net>
The issues process to be used by WS-CHOR Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: member-ws-chor@w3.org > From: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> > Date: 15 July 2003 16:33:25 BST > To: <member-ws-chor@w3.org> > Subject: Issues Process > > > > As per my action point, here is a brief description of how I propose > to use > bugzilla to manage issues within the WG. > > W3C's Bugzilla can be reached at http://www.w3.org/Bugs > > 1. As issues are raised they are recorded into bugzilla by either the > chairs > or the issues editor. > 2. The issue gets categorized, called a component in bugzilla. It is > up to > the issues editor to ensure > each issue is placed into a category. If one does not seem to be > appropriate, the chairs will create a new component. > 3. The issues editor performs an initial screen, completes those that > are > not worth pursuing (see step 5) and seeks owners for > each remaining issue. > 4. Owners will be actioned by the chairs to come up with proposals to > resolve the issue. > 5. The work group considers each proposal and agrees/disagrees. If > there is > disagreement, the owner must work on a new resolution. > 4. Upon an agreed completion of an Issue, the Owner marks the status as > closed, and provides one of the following resolutions: > FIXED: Issue accepted and resolution agreed/implemented. > INVALID: Not a well formed issue or not appropriate > DUPLICATE: Same as an existing issue. > > Bugzilla should not be used for discussing the issue. The normal email > lists > should be used for that purpose, and when appropriate > links to the mail archive should be made from the issue in bugzilla. In > dealing with issues from external sources, for which the W3C > has a defined process [1], the issue in bugzilla should reference all > communication with the external party. > > I'm sure there are some holes in this, so I look forward to your > comments. > > Martin. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/policies.html#formal- > address > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Martin Chapman 500 Oracle Parkway > Consulting Member of Technical Staff Ms 4op990 > Oracle Redwood Shores, > P: +1 650 506 6941 CA 94065 > e: martin.chapman@oracle.com USA > > This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If > you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose > its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. > Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not > liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their > own antivirus software. >
Attachments
- text/enriched attachment: stored
- text/ignore attachment: SecurityCheck.txt
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 05:39:45 UTC