W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > December 2003

RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography

From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:08:03 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20031204210406.04af46f8@rgmamerimap.oraclecorp.com>
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org

At 12:39 PM 12/3/2003, Champion, Mike wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:31 PM
> > To: Monica J. Martin; Burdett, David
> > Cc: Jean-Jacques Dubray; Steve Ross-Talbot;
> > public-ws-chor@w3.org; Haugen Robert; Yunker, John; Jon Pyke
> > Subject: RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in
> > a context / s ematics and choreography
> >
>
> > It is very easy for a W3C WG to drag the resolution of some
> > issues forever, since we strive for consensus. But let's keep
> > in mind that it is that type of behavior that in the end can
> > sink the WG.
>
>+1  This permathread could drag WS-Chor down the way the REST permathread
>dragged down WSA.

The man speaks great wisdom, painfully gained. We would be well advised to 
heed this warning.

    cheers,
     jeff


Jeff Mischkinsky                      jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Consulting Member Technical Staff     +1(650)506-1975
Director, Web Services Standards      500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation                    Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 03:10:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC