W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process

From: Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:27:41 +0000
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20031208132554.071129e8@pop3.demon.co.uk>
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org

Arkin said:

>You can have a user definition coming from one source (say, group manager) and user process definition coming from a different source (say, process designer) and mix and >match them, including the ability to do multiple references (i.e. one user definition reused across many user processes, and vice versa). 

Absolutely. This is the type of process reuse, consolidation and combinatorials that the BPMI.org group was getting at and which we think will
kick start the market for process technologies on a huge scale, just as HTML for the Web.

H


---

New Book - Business Process Management: The Third Wave
www.bpm3.com

Howard Smith/CSC/BPMI.org
cell +44 7711 594 494 (operates worldwide, dial UK)
office +44 20 8660 1963 
Received on Monday, 8 December 2003 08:30:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC