public-ws-addressing@w3.org from November 2005 by date

Wednesday, 30 November 2005

• Minutes of the 2005-11-28 teleconference Mark Nottingham
• RE: TAG requests help with examples of WS-Addressing Cahill, Conor P

Tuesday, 29 November 2005

• Re: TAG requests help with examples of WS-Addressing Davanum Srinivas
• TAG requests help with examples of WS-Addressing noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Text to insert as section 3.1.3 David Hull

Monday, 28 November 2005

• "On the Web" David Orchard
• That URL once again David Hull
• Delta for "proposed async text" David Hull
• RE: Options 1 and 3 Here we go. Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Options 1 and 3 Here we go. Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Syntax options for Async Anish Karmarkar
• RE: CR10 : Refined proposal. Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-11-28 David Hull
• Options 1 and 3 Here we go. Yalcinalp, Umit

Sunday, 27 November 2005

• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-11-28 Mark Nottingham
• Minutes of the 2005-11-21 teleconference Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 23 November 2005

• Question on medation useing WS-Addressing Jaliya Ekanayake
• Re: CR10 : Refined proposal. Hugo Haas

Tuesday, 22 November 2005

• Test 1205 and the SOAP processing model Dan Diephouse
• RE: Syntax options for Async Christopher B Ferris
• SOAP Message Exchange Patterns and Web Service Addressing Neil Hudson

Monday, 21 November 2005

• RE: Syntax options for Async Glen Daniels
• Re: Syntax options for Async Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Syntax options for Async Anish Karmarkar
• Regrets for 11/21 call Francisco Curbera
• RE: Syntax options for Async Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR10 : Refined proposal. Mark Baker
• CR10 : Refined proposal. Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 18 November 2005

• [Fwd: Re: Proposed text for async] David Hull
• Re: Proposed text for async Marc Hadley
• Re: Syntax options for Async Marc Hadley

Thursday, 17 November 2005

• Re: Syntax options for Async David Hull
• RE: Syntax options for Async Rogers, Tony
• Regrets for next Monday David Hull
• regrets for 21st Nov Katy Warr
• Re: Syntax options for Async Neil Hudson
• Boy and a Girl, regrets David Orchard

Wednesday, 16 November 2005

• RE: Syntax options for Async Yalcinalp, Umit
• Possible issue (or subissue of i059): {soap mep} property in WSDL adjuncts David Hull
• Re: Syntax options for Async David Hull
• Syntax options for Async Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 15 November 2005

• RE: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F Gilbert Pilz
• Re: Reference Parameters in WSDL Katy Warr

Monday, 14 November 2005

• Re: Reference Parameters in WSDL Marc Hadley
• Re: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F Katy Warr
• Proposed text for async David Hull
• Reference Parameters in WSDL Katy Warr

Thursday, 10 November 2005

• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-11-21 Mark Nottingham
• Minutes of the Tokyo F2F Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 9 November 2005

• RE: Slides for Async discussion resolution paul.downey@bt.com
• Slides for Async discussion resolution Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 8 November 2005

• Editor's Drafts Rogers, Tony
• RE: Markup David Orchard
• RE: Markup Rogers, Tony
• Re: Markup Anish Karmarkar

Monday, 7 November 2005

• RE: Agenda: 2005-11-07 F2F, Tokyo JP (DIAL-IN info?) Paul Knight

Tuesday, 8 November 2005

• Re: Markup David Hull
• Re: Markup Marc Hadley
• Re: One-way SOAP 1.1 HTTP Binding using protocol MEP David Hull

Monday, 7 November 2005

• One-way SOAP 1.1 HTTP Binding using protocol MEP David Orchard
• RE: David Orchard
• Markup David Hull
• Questions about Marc's issue 59 proposal David Orchard
• Async MEP semantics David Hull
• RE: A suggestion for async resolution.... :o) Yalcinalp, Umit
• A suggestion for async resolution.... :o) Katy Warr
• Proposal 4 Umit Yalcinalp
• RE: Async req-res: addendum to marc's proposal Vikas Deolaliker
• Re: Async req-res: addendum to marc's proposal Anish Karmarkar
• Re: 202 David Hull
• Async req-res: addendum to marc's proposal Anish Karmarkar

Saturday, 5 November 2005

• Re: cr9: wsa:Action for undefined faults Hugo Haas
• RE: 202 paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Issue 59 proposal David Hull
• RE: Issue 59 proposal David Orchard
• Re: Issue 59 proposal David Hull

Friday, 4 November 2005

• Re: Issue 59 proposal Marc Hadley
• Re: Issue 59: A use case -- out-of-phase HTTP David Hull
• Re: Issue 59: A use case -- out-of-phase HTTP David Hull
• Re: Issue 59: A use case -- out-of-phase HTTP John Kemp
• 202 David Hull
• RE: Agenda: 2005-11-07 F2F, Tokyo JP David Orchard
• Issue 59 proposal David Orchard

Thursday, 3 November 2005

• Issue 59: A use case -- out-of-phase HTTP David Hull
• WWW 2006 Mark Little

Wednesday, 2 November 2005

• RE: Issue 59 alternate proposal Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Issue 59 alternate proposal David Hull
• RE: Issue 59 alternate proposal Yalcinalp, Umit
• Permanent regrets Mark Peel
• Re: Issue 59 alternate proposal Marc Hadley
• RE: Issue 59 alternate proposal David Orchard
• Agenda: 2005-11-07 F2F, Tokyo JP Mark Nottingham
• RE: Issue 59 alternate proposal Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 1 November 2005

• Issue 59 alternate proposal Marc Hadley
• Minutes of the 2005-10-31 teleconference Mark Nottingham
• RE: cr9: wsa:Action for undefined faults Jonathan Marsh
• Re: cr9: wsa:Action for undefined faults Marc Hadley

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2005 18:23:54 UTC