Re: cr9: wsa:Action for undefined faults

On Oct 25, 2005, at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> I had an action to provide spec text for the preferred option (3):
>
> I propose we add to Section 5 of the SOAP Binding, right after the  
> text:
>
>   The [action] property below designates WS-Addressing fault messages:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/fault
>
> This paragraph:
>
>   The [action] property value below MAY be used to designate SOAP  
> fault
>   messages (e.g. mustUnderstand faults):
>
>     http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/soap/fault
>
A hopefully friendly amendment:

SOAP modules and extensions MAY define custom [action] values for the  
faults they describe or MAY designate use of the following [action]  
value instead:

   http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/soap/fault

The above [action] value SHOULD be used for generic SOAP faults  
including version mismatch, must understand, and data encoding unknown.

Marc.

> That's it!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:35 PM
> To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> Cc: peter.hendry@capeclear.com; tom@coastin.com
> Subject: [New Issue] FW: wsa:Action for undefined faults
>
>
> Please add this issue to the CR issues list.
>
> Several options have emerged so far:
>
> Option 0: Do nothing - describing this level of fault oversteps the
>           bounds of WS-Addressing.  Perhaps note in the spec that\
>           such action values are explicitly not defined.
> Option 1: Reuse http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/fault.
> Option 2: Define a new action URI for soap faults (e.g. /soap/fault).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan  
> Marsh
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: Pete Hendry; tom@coastin.com
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: wsa:Action for undefined faults
>
>
> In the submission a static fault URI was used for all faults  
> (including
> general SOAP faults).  Seems like we lost that when we changed how  
> fault
> actions are determined.  I propose the simplest fix, that we also  
> state
> that SOAP faults use the action we've already defined:
> http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/fault.
>
> P.S. Is this on the issues list?  I didn't see it there...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
>> addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pete Hendry
>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 1:53 AM
>> To: tom@coastin.com
>> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: wsa:Action for undefined faults
>>
>>
>>
>> It doesn't cover general SOAP level faults (bad request, etc.). What
>> is
>> used for them?
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> Tom Rutt wrote:
>>
>>> Pete Hendry wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The definition of wsa:Action says
>>>>
>>>>    /wsa:Action
>>>>    This REQUIRED element of type xs:anyURI conveys the [action]
>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering what value Action takes where a general SOAP fault
>> is
>>>> encountered such as malformed XML? This will not match any fault
>>>> defined in the WSDL. Also, what value does it take when of the the
>>>> WSA faults occur? I assume REQUIRED means on both request and
>>>> response even if the response is a fault?
>>>>
>>>> In section 3.2 it says
>>>>
>>>>    Populate the reply message's message addressing properties
>>>>       o [destination]: ...
>>>>       o [relationship]: ...
>>>>       o [reference parameters]: ...
>>>>
>>>> Missing from this is [action]? The examples that follow should
>>>> wsa:Action in each case.
>>>>
>>>> Does there need to be general fault action URIs such as
>>>
>>>
>>> One is defined in the Soap binding
>>> spec:http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-
>> soap.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>>>
>>>
>>> In section 5 the following paragraph defines generic URI
>>> "
>>>
>>> The [action] property below designates WS-Addressing fault messages:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/fault
>>> "
>>>
>>> Tom Rutt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>    .../fault/addressing
>>>>    .../fault/unspecified
>>>>
>>>> I am coming up against this problem in implementing the spec.
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.