RE: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F

Actually, the whole minutes seemed to be garbled. Issue 59 discussion is
slapped in the middle of discussing telcon minutes (there is a
resolution that follows the discussion which is unrelated). It seems
that there is a cut and paste problem...


--umit
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gilbert Pilz
> Sent: Tuesday, Nov 15, 2005 12:30 PM
> To: WS-Addressing
> Subject: RE: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F
> 
> 
> The first part of the i059 discussion has me down as making a 
> number of
> suggestions about how to resolve i059. While its kind of neat 
> to imagine
> myself making such insightful and useful suggestions, I 
> believe that it
> was Katy and Umit who put these forward.
> 
> - g 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> > Mark Nottingham
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 11:12 PM
> > To: WS-Addressing
> > Subject: Minutes of the Tokyo F2F
> > 
> > ... are available for review at:
> >    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/11/f2f-minutes.html
> > 
> > and attached for convenience.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:47:11 UTC