- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:23:09 -0800
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <markn@bea.com>, "WS-Addressing" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I've made a proposal for issue 59. I request that issue 59 be talked about after lunch. I won't be able to make a morning call-in (afternoon my time) as there will be >20 women doing strange rituals involving babies and baby preparation in our house. I believe most of them intend to leave by lunch japan time. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nottingham > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:30 PM > To: WS-Addressing > Subject: Agenda: 2005-11-07 F2F, Tokyo JP > > > W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - face-to-face meeting agenda > 7-9 November > Logistics linked from the WG Admin page <http://www.w3.org/2002/ > ws/addr/admin#schedule> > ( All times are JP/Yokohama; see: http://tinyuri.com/e620 ) > > Monday, November 7th > ------------------------------------- > 09:00-09:15 > - Introductions > - Roll Call > - Assign Scribes > - Agenda Review > - AOB > - Action Item Review <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/ > admin#actionitems> > 2005-10-31: cr10 - David Orchard to make modified proposal. > PENDING > 2005-10-31: i059 - Marc Hadley to create more fully-formed > counterpropsal. DONE > 2005-10-31: cr9 - Marc Hadley to propose amendment to Jonathan's > proposal. PENDING > > 09:15-10:45 Working Draft Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd- > issues/> > * i056/i057 clarification > <http://www.w3.org/mid/AC23771B-12D3-4D62-B139-5F3529152C1C@Sun.COM> > > * i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? > Owner: Katy Warr > Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/OFC44E44D8.3E261C7B-ON8025709D. > 007107EC-8025709D.0074EB80@uk.ibm.com> > Proposal 2: <http://www.w3.org/mid/OFC44E44D8.3E261C7B-ON8025709D. > 007107EC-8025709D.0074EB80@uk.ibm.com> > > * i059 - Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services > Owner: Glen Daniels > ACTION: 2005-10-31: Marc Hadley to create more fully-formed > counterpropsal. DONE > Proposal 1: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws- > addressing/2005Oct/att-0116/ProposalTake3.htm> > Proposal 2: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D1503191-88CA-4537- > A20A-1F891F43606D@Sun.COM> > > 10:45-11:00 Morning Break > 11:00-12:30 Working Draft Issues (cont'd) > 12:30-01:30 Lunch > 01:30-03:00 WD Issues (cont'd) > 03:00-03:30 Afternoon Break > 03:30-05:00 WD Issues (cont'd) > > Tuesday, November 8th > ------------------------------------- > 09:00-10:45 Candidate Recommendation Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ > ws/addr/cr-issues/> > > * cr9 - wsa:Action for undefined faults > ACTION: 2005-10-31: Marc Hadley to propose amendment to Jonathan's > proposal. PENDING > Proposal 1: Do nothing / Perhaps note in the spec that such action > values are explicitly not defined. > Proposal 2: Reuse http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/fault. > Proposal 3: Define a new action URI for soap faults (e.g. /soap/ > fault). > Proposal 4: <http://www.w3.org/mid/ > 37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E8845EF6@RED- > MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> > > * cr10 - TAG Request for Change to WS Addressing Core > ACTION: 2005-10-31: David Orchard to make modified proposal. PENDING > Proposal 1: Add note: Web Architecture dictates that resources > should be identified with URIs. Thus, use of the abstract properties > of an EPR other than wsa:address to identify resources is contrary to > Web Architecture. In certain circumstances, use of such additional > properties may be convenient or beneficial, perhaps due to the > availability of QName-based tools. When building systems that > violate this principle, care must be taken to weigh the tradeoffs > inherent in deploying resources that are not on the Web. > > * cr11 - SOAP Binding and SOAPAction in SOAP 1.1 > Proposal 1: "Use of the SOAPAction HTTP header is required in the > HTTP Request when using the SOAP 1.1 HTTP binding. The value of the > SOAPAction HTTP header, if present, MUST either be "[action]" or > "" (quotes are significant). The latter case supports the ability to > obscure the wsa:Action header through SOAP-level security mechanisms, > without requiring otherwise unnecessary transport-level security. A > SOAPAction value different to "[action]" or "", results in the > generation of an Action Mismatch fault (see 5.4.1.6 Action Mismatch)." > > 10:45-11:00 Morning Break > 11:00-12:30 CR Issues (cont'd) > 12:30-01:30 Lunch > 01:30-03:00 Candidate Recommendation Testing > <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/> > > 03:00-03:30 Afternoon Break > 03:30-05:00 CR Testing (cont'd) > > Wednesday, November 10th > ------------------------------------ > 09:00-10:45 Joint Meeting w/ Description WG > 10:45-11:00 Morning Break > 11:00-01:00 Joint Meeting (cont'd) > > > -- > Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist > Office of the CTO BEA Systems > >
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 01:23:21 UTC