i009 - processingStyle proposal
Proposed resolution for issues 24 (metadata) and 26 (multiple ports)
- Re: Proposed resolution for issues 24 (metadata) and 26 (multiple ports)
- RE: Proposed resolution for issues 24 (metadata) and 26 (multiple ports)
RE: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers. [i046]
NEW ISSUE: [relationship] Order of URI pairs is ambiguous
Action related to i043
RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers [i048]
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-01-31
Snapshots of the drafts for review
Issue 15 - Redirection
RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
Fwd: IRI and updated URI specs published as RFC 3987, RFC 3986 (STD 66)
NEW ISSUE: Absolute vs relative URIs
New TAG Issue: endPointRef-47 (was Re: New issue; WS-Addressing SOAP binding & app protocols)
Re: i043 comparison of refps
NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
- RE: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers
issue 1 on editor's copy
Minutes of the 2005-01-24 telconference
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-01-24
Minutes of the 2005-01-[17,18,19] Melbourne F2F
Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal
- RE: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal
- Re: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal
- Re: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal
- RE: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal
problems faced by ws-addr with WSDL 2.0 extensibility
New issue -- wsdl specific things in core
Issue i020, subissue 3 proposal
Issue i020 -- restate the subissues in issue i020
Agenda, 19 Jan 2005 joint WS Description, WS Addressing FTF meeting
Issue 6 proposal rework
NEW ISSUE: Comparison of refps
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of refps
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of refps
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of refps [i043]
NEW ISSUE: Definition of the rules to reply to a message in Core 3.2
Issue 040: Processing Model for our SOAP Faults
NEW ISSUE : Extensibility model needs a little fleshing out (processing model, understand/ignore semantics)
Issue #1 proposed resolution
- Re: Issue #1 proposed resolution
- RE: Issue #1 proposed resolution
- RE: Issue #1 proposed resolution
- RE: Issue #1 proposed resolution
- Re: Issue #1 proposed resolution
- RE: Issue #1 proposed resolution
i022 - Relationship to the SOAP binding framework (summary)
NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers.
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers.
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers. [i046]
NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs.
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs.
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs.
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Action defaults don't work with URNs. [i045]
i035: unique action values for faults
Interesting commentary on EPRs
Review of WS-Chor
Issue i021 WSDL Extension for Addressing: status and discussion on requirements
Agenda: 2005-01-17 F2F, Melbourne, VIC AU
Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
- RE: Issue 7 - processing model for SOAP headers
SOAP Detail Element Question
Minutes 20050110
i041: Testing Template
Alternatives for resolving subissue 1 in issue i017
- Re: Alternatives for resolving subissue 1 in issue i017
- RE: Alternatives for resolving subissue 1 in issue i017
RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
- RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.
ACTION 2004-12-20: Security of wrapper vs attribute
Issue i001: what and how many things are we identifying?
- Re: Issue i001: what and how many things are we identifying?
- Re: Issue i001: what and how many things are we identifying?