- From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:22:04 +1100
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 19:26:13 UTC
Grammatically, you should not use "first" and "second" with just two items; should be "former" and "latter". But "first" and "second" are probably better for readers whose English is not perfect, I suppose. -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Jonathan Marsh Sent: Tue 01-Feb-05 4:30 To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Cc: Subject: NEW ISSUE: [relationship] Order of URI pairs is ambiguous Section 3 of the Core spec says that [relationship] is a pair of URIs, one identifying the relationship, and another identifying the corresponding [message id]. The text doesn't say clearly what the order of these pairs is, though there is an implication that the type of the relationship is first, the related message id second. Proposal: Clarify the implication, possibly by simply adding "the first URI of each pair is..." and "the second URI of each pair is...".
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 19:26:13 UTC