- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:30:20 -0000
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
<snip /> > > Metadata such as WSDL and Policy surrounding endpoints *may*, or indeed > *may not* differ for a whole host of different reasons, including having > more than one description mechanism for an endpoint, other interactions > which may have taken place, username being used, content negotiation, > out of band data, etc, etc. Therefore this sentence is at best redundant, > worst misleading. > > As with the EPR life cycle, we should push how EPRs and any surrounding > meta-data may be employed, compared and cached firmly out of scope and > in the domain of specs layering upon Addressing. > > So in the absence of a compelling requirement for specifying EPR > comparison in *this* specification, I feel we should put EPR comparison > out of our misery and ditch the whole of section 2.3. > +1 .savas.
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 21:39:27 UTC