Re: NEW ISSUE: EPR comparison rule doesn't support Web services gateways/routers

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
> > understood Paco to want is to be able to *identify* services behind a
> 
> You completely misunderstood Paco.

That's certainly possible, but he did say things consistent with that
position.  If we've identified a misunderstanding, then great.

> > the question above was to find out if the "gateway" could be a proxy,
> > in which case there's no layering issue since a proxy works on behalf
> > of the sender.
> 
> Think of it as a reverse proxy that works on behalf of the recipients.

Erm, right, that's what I meant. 8-)  Either way though, the layering
is fine.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:11:04 UTC