- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:13:38 -0000
- To: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, <tom@coastin.com>
- Cc: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <tim@mindreef.com>
Would there have been a discussion like this if all the addressing
related information elements were encapsulated in a WSA-specific header?
<soap:Header>
<wsa:addressing soap:mustUnderstand="true">
<wsa:To> +
<wsa:ReplyTo>*
<wsa:FaultTo>*
<wsa:any namespace="##other">* <!--This to allow DaveO's V2 -->
</wsa:addressing>
</soap:Header>
I vaguely remember something like this being discussed already and
rejected. Am I right? Sorry, but I couldn't find anything relevant in
the archives.
(Note, don't confuse this with the wrapper proposal for RefProps/Params)
--
Savas Parastatidis
http://savas.parastatidis.name
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 02:14:01 UTC