- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:42:33 +1100
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
I was responding to the question by Savas on the difficulty of distributing such a large number of EPRs. If the reference parameters are supposed to be Opaque, the client is not supposed to be able to "figure out" the reference scheme in use, thus they would see it as 40000 independent EPRs. Actually this discussion might be better to continue on the WS-RF TC list. Tom Rutt Fujitsu Mark Baker wrote: >On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:43:25AM +1100, Tom Rutt wrote: > > >>However this would entail 40000 EPRs for that machine room. >> >>With such large numbers, this flexibility is probably not worth the high >>price of so many EPRs. >> >> > >Can you explain where this high price comes from? I can't see it. >I'd much rather have references to these things that I could pass >around to many different types of applications, rather than a private >identification scheme (<row>33</row>) known only to this one app. > >Mark. > > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2005 23:45:19 UTC