Aleksandar Stojiljkovic via GitHub
Amit Hilbuch via GitHub
Andreas Pehrson via GitHub
Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
armax00
Bernard Aboba via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we remove getDefaultIceServers? (#2023) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 28 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] createOffer does not guard against "have-remote-offer" (#2145) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCSctpTransport should inherit EventTarget (#2130) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 21 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Monday, 18 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Thursday, 14 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 14 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 14 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] nullable usernameFragment & add a "create an RTCIceCandidate" algorithm. (#2120) (Thursday, 14 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 14 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Does direction matter for rejected m= sections? (#1812) (Thursday, 14 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (#2113) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCError parameters (#2111) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency description (#2110) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
Cullen Jennings via GitHub
David Sanders via GitHub
docfaraday via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] [[LastOffer]] and [[LastAnswer]] should probably be cleared when negotiation completes (#2131) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make RTCIceCandidateInit optional in addIceCandidate (fixes #2125) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Tuesday, 5 March)
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Fix warnings from respec on broken automatic links (#415) (Monday, 25 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fix warnings from respec on broken automatic links (Sunday, 24 March)
- [webrtc-stats] References to undefined RTCReceiverAudioTrackAttachmentStats and RTCReceiverVideoTrackAttachmentStats (#414) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obtain user consent for one-way media and data use cases (#2012) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obtain user consent for one-way media and data use cases (#2012) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Re-adding a removed track causes identical msids. What do do? (#1702) (Friday, 15 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Isolated Media Streams requires modification on permission algorithms in GUM and Permissions specs (#1646) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Isolated Media Streams requires modification on permission algorithms in GUM and Permissions specs (#1646) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Failure of transmission of isolated stream (#1264) (Friday, 15 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Failure of transmission of isolated stream (#1264) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Switch order of arguments to RTCError (#2112) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Integrate CSP access control into algorithms (#1742) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.addTrack/removeTrack can be described in terms of Transceivers. This may be good for understanding them. (#1758) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] transceiver.direction doesn’t respond, if out-of-sync. (#1940) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] callback-based https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#method-extensions are not covered by WPT tests (#2022) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make possible to select TURN allocation address family (to avoid IPv6 confusion) (#1972) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] More simulcast examples (#2035) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] special-casing of a=msid:- (#2027) (Friday, 1 March)
Emil Ivov via GitHub
Emircan Uysaler via GitHub
ExE Boss via GitHub
Florent Castelli via GitHub
Francesco Durighetto via GitHub
guest271314 via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Saturday, 30 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Proposal: DecodeConcatVideoData (input multiple files or streams) => Output: single webm file (#575) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Clarify if requestFrame is intended to be defined as a method of CanvasCaptureMediaStream or MediaStreamTrack (#76) (Saturday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-fromelement] Clarify if requestFrame is intended to be defined as a method of CanvasCaptureMediaStream or MediaStreamTrack (#76) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Friday, 22 March)
- [mediacapture-record] Feature request: Concat filter (#166) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] How to concatenate Blobs of recordings into single file capable of playback? (#130) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder needs to define effect of adding / removing tracks in its input MediaStream (#4) (Wednesday, 13 March)
guidou via GitHub
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate fingerprinting from OverconstrainedError in gUM(). (#564) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] s/LastOffer/LastCreateOffer/ ditto answer. (#2140) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCDataChannel.id assignment (#1818) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Multiple simulcast streams = multiple oubound-rtp streams (#394) (Sunday, 24 March)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Sunday, 24 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add note about simulcast having multiple SSRCs (Sunday, 24 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-fromelement] Clarify if requestFrame is intended to be defined as a method of CanvasCaptureMediaStream or MediaStreamTrack (#76) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Clarify if requestFrame is intended to be defined as a method of CanvasCaptureMediaStream or MediaStreamTrack (#76) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Clarify if requestFrame is intended to be defined as a method of CanvasCaptureMediaStream or MediaStreamTrack (#76) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2139) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (#574) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 21 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] [[LastOffer]] and [[LastAnswer]] should probably be cleared when negotiation completes (#2131) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 21 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Misalignment with -stats? (#2126) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 21 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate construction is under-specified (Editorial) (#2119) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make RTCSctpTransport an EventTarget (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCSctpTransport should inherit EventTarget (#2130) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Rename nackCount to nacksReceived & nacksSent respectively? (#390) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Rename nackCount to nacksReceived & nacksSent respectively? (#390) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add counters for the subset of concealedSamples that are not silent (#409) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Clarify concealedSamples (#405) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Fix exception name in RTCRtpTransceiver.setCodecPreferences (#2129) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Misalignment with -stats? (#2126) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Sunday, 10 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
henbos via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.jitterBufferDelayHint attribute added. (#2149) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] s/LastOffer/LastCreateOffer/ ditto answer. (#2140) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.jitterBufferDelayHint attribute added. (#2149) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.jitterBufferDelayHint attribute added. (#2149) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpReceiver.jitterBufferDelayHint attribute added. (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Saturday, 23 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2138) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2138) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Lift [[LastOffer]]/[[LastAnswer]] checks above JSEP, & set'em to "" on stable. (#2132) (Friday, 22 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add insertedSamplesForDeceleration and removedSamplesForAcceleration (#408) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add fecPacketsDiscarded (#412) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add silentConcealedSamples (#410) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add fecPacketsDiscarded (#412) (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add fecPacketsDiscarded (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add error correction metrics (#411) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add error correction metrics (#411) (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add error correction metrics (#411) (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add audibleConcealedSamples (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add counters for the subset of concealedSamples that are not silent (#409) (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add stats for accelerating/decelarating playout speed (#407) (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Clarify concealedSamples (Monday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Clarify concealedSamples (#405) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Differences between pc.removeTrack(sender) and sender.replaceTrack(null) (#2024) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Friday, 15 March)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from the set of transceivers (#2102) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] MediaTrackCapabilities (#93) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Differences between pc.removeTrack(sender) and sender.replaceTrack(null) (#2024) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Differences between pc.removeTrack(sender) and sender.replaceTrack(null) (#2024) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Differences between pc.removeTrack(sender) and sender.replaceTrack(null) (#2024) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 8 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (#2113) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency description (#2110) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Work through implications of simulcast (#318) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Work through implications of simulcast (#318) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move all stream stats from the "sender"/"receiver" stats (#402) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTC[Audio/Video]SenderStats should have mid (#396) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Width and Height of Simulcast layers sent (#378) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Width and Height of Simulcast layers sent (#378) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Remove RTC[Audio/Video][Sender/Receiver]Stats.remoteSource (#399) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Simulcast stats (#2116) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add RTCEncodingParameterStats (#398) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Move all stream stats from the "sender"/"receiver" stats (#402) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add RTCMediaSourceStats (#400) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add RTCMediaSourceStats (#400) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Remove RTC[Audio/Video][Sender/Receiver]Stats.remoteSource (#399) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add RTCEncodingParameterStats (#398) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add RTCOutboundRtpStreamStats.framesDiscardedOnSend (#397) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] RTC[Audio/Video]SenderStats should have mid (#396) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add RTCOutboundRtpStreamStats.rid (#395) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Multiple simulcast streams = multiple oubound-rtp streams (#394) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCError parameters (#2111) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCError parameters (#2111) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCError parameters (#2111) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
ivocreusen via GitHub
Iñaki Baz Castillo via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Tuesday, 5 March)
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] s/LastOffer/LastCreateOffer/ ditto answer. (#2140) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] transceiver.stop() needs more work (avoid BUNDLE footgun) (#2150) (Thursday, 28 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify or fix racy peerIdentity validation failure (#2148) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] simulcast offer doesn't work with addTrack. An omission (#2147) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- [webrtc-pc] simulcast offer doesn't work with addTrack. An omission (#2147) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Allow createOffer() only in "stable" and "have-local-offer" (Tuesday, 26 March)
- [webrtc-pc] createOffer does not guard against "have-remote-offer" (#2145) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- [webrtc-pc] SLD({type: "offer"}) wo/createOffer should be InvalidModificationError (#2143) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2139) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2138) (Friday, 22 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: s/LastOffer/LastCreateOffer/ ditto answer. (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (#574) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Fix for Issue 2126 - misalignment with -stats. (#2128) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Lift [[LastOffer]]/[[LastAnswer]] checks above JSEP, & set'em to "" on stable. (#2132) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Lift [[LastOffer]]/[[LastAnswer]] checks above JSEP, & set'em to "" on stable. (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Monday, 18 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Re-adding a removed track causes identical msids. What do do? (#1702) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Re-adding a removed track causes identical msids. What do do? (#1702) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] nullable usernameFragment & add a "create an RTCIceCandidate" algorithm. (#2120) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Redundant queuing in connection state computations. (#2020) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Differences between pc.removeTrack(sender) and sender.replaceTrack(null) (#2024) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 8 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reuse stop algo in close(), fixing currentDirection = null (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] pc.close() should null out currentDirection (#2122) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Constrainable properties on remote tracks are under-specified (#2121) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: nullable usernameFragment & add a "create an RTCIceCandidate" algorithm. (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate construction is under-specified (Editorial) (#2119) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Set direction="inactive" if rejected (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Does direction matter for rejected m= sections? (#1812) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we surface a=msid changes to JS, even though they're not compliant with draft-jsep? (#2115) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Saturday, 2 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCError parameters (#2111) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 1 March)
Kevin Gibbons via GitHub
Lennart Grahl via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Procedure for DataChannelId assignment on transport open not specified (#2144) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obtain user consent for one-way media and data use cases (#2012) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidateInit has no required fields, so should probably be optional in addIceCandidate (#2125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (#2113) (Tuesday, 5 March)
Lorenzo Miniero via GitHub
Martin Thomson via GitHub
Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub
Nick Doty via GitHub
Nils Ohlmeier via GitHub
Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] simulcast offer doesn't work with addTrack. An omission (#2147) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2138) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing CNAME in RID based simulcast offer (#2114) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast stats (#2116) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] special-casing of a=msid:- (#2027) (Saturday, 2 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] special-casing of a=msid:- (#2027) (Saturday, 2 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
Roman Shpount via GitHub
Ruslan Burakov via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2139) (Friday, 22 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 22 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2138) (Friday, 22 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (#2139) (Friday, 22 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to RTCRtpReceiver (Friday, 22 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add setTargetJitterBufferDelay method to the RTCRtpReceiver (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add video latency constrainable property (#2109) (Friday, 1 March)
Sergio Garcia Murillo via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast: Which layer gets dropped first? (#2080) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to assign bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Missing specification on how to drop bandwidth between encodings and/or drop simulcast layers (#2141) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver-transceivers should get associated with offered m= sections (#2108) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] `ssrc` in `RTCRtpEncodingParameters` is inconsistent with ORTC (#1174) (Friday, 1 March)
Sourabh via GitHub
stefan hakansson via GitHub
Steve Anton via GitHub
Tim Panton via GitHub
Varun Singh via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Fix warnings from respec on broken automatic links (#415) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] References to undefined RTCReceiverAudioTrackAttachmentStats and RTCReceiverVideoTrackAttachmentStats (#414) (Monday, 25 March)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add error correction metrics (#411) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] initial commit for webrtc-stats-testing (#387) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Clarify concealedSamples (#405) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add fecPacketsDiscarded (#412) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add deceleratedSamples and acceleratedSamples (#408) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add stats for accelerating/decelarating playout speed (#407) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add counters for the subset of concealedSamples that are not silent (#409) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Misalignment with -stats? (#2126) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Impact on Track Stats because of moving stats from sender/receiver to appropriate in/outbound rtp (#403) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Impact on Track Stats because of moving stats from sender/receiver to appropriate in/outbound rtp (#403) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Should track also contain RTCRtpReceiver stats? (#361) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] framesDecoded is on both "receiver" and "inbound-rtp" (#392) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] audioLevel can be removed from "track"|"receiver"|"sender" stats (#391) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add RTCEncodingParameterStats (#398) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move all stream stats from the "sender"/"receiver" stats (#402) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Correlating RTCInboundRtpStreamStats with simulcast streams (#393) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- [webrtc-stats] Add SVC stats in RTC[In/Out]boundRtpStreamStats (#401) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add RTCOutboundRtpStreamStats.rid (#395) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Multiple simulcast streams = multiple oubound-rtp streams (#394) (Wednesday, 6 March)
youennf via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (#574) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (#574) (Monday, 25 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Sunday, 24 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Set the configuration is unnecessarily checking for some members being set (#2142) (Sunday, 24 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Strengthen generateCertificate expires capping (#2137) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (#574) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add a note detailing that prflx candidates are not exposed by getRemoteCandidates (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-pc] getSelectedCandidatePair needs special treatment for PRFLX candidates (#2134) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Thursday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Mitigate getUserMedia/enumerateDevices fingerprinting issues based on device info permission (Thursday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Ask for user gesture to call getDisplayMedia (#104) (Thursday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not return prflx candidates (#2124) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Why do we have overconstrained event? (#573) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] set-pc-configuration is unclear on how to match certificates (#2043) (Thursday, 14 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make the certificate "in the future check" be based on the current time (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (#2113) (Wednesday, 6 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (#2113) (Monday, 4 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarifying how setConfiguration checks certificate values (Monday, 4 March)
Last message date: Saturday, 30 March 2019 18:42:54 UTC