- From: Harald Alvestrand via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:44:51 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Good questions. The most important part of a prflx candidate (the IP address) is readily observable to anyone with access to the network - but JS generally doesn't have that. It seems obvious that seeing a candidate in stats or in the active candidate pair, and then not finding that candidate in getRemoteCandidates, is going to be puzzling to users who expect logical consistency between these candidate sets. So we can either spend resources explaining the inconsistency, or find a consistent way of representing prflx candidates wherever candidates are listed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alvestrand Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2124#issuecomment-475182856 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2019 10:44:53 UTC