public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from March 2019 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) Lucas Verra
• [w3c/payment-request] Set [[waitForUpdate]] to true on dispatch of payerdetailchange (#857) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) Marcos Cáceres

Saturday, 30 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) Wonsuk Lee

Friday, 29 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Thursday, 28 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) Matt Saxon
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) Marcos Cáceres

Wednesday, 27 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) Matt Saxon
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) ianbjacobs

Tuesday, 26 March 2019

• [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) Nick Telford-Reed
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) Adrian Hope-Bailie
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Marcos Cáceres

Monday, 25 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Give AddressInit's members defaults (#852) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) chaals
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) chaals
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) chaals
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) David Chadwick
• [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) Marcos Cáceres

Sunday, 24 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) David Chadwick
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) David Chadwick
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define "last one wins" approach when Basic Card modifiers are equivalent (#60) Marcos Cáceres

Saturday, 23 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] fix: give AddressInit members defaults (#852) Marcos Cáceres

Friday, 22 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Chore: unleash ReSpec xrefs (#851) Marcos Cáceres

Thursday, 21 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Tuesday, 19 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) asmusf
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] Chore: unleash ReSpec xrefs (#851) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) asmusf
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Martin Dürst

Monday, 18 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) ktmitton
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) ktmitton
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should it be possible to provide "total" amounts in more than one currency (#3) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] A distinct invoice address should be supported (#550) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] A distinct invoice address should be supported (#550) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) asmusf
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Friday, 15 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Thursday, 14 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) Denis Ah-Kang
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) ianbjacobs

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Tuesday, 12 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Rouslan Solomakhin
• [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Monday, 11 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) stuller
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) Rouslan Solomakhin
• [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) Rouslan Solomakhin
• [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) richardPAG

Saturday, 9 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Tracked And not a Joke (#68) ianbjacobs
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Tracked And not a Joke (#68) alexavena72
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) Marcos Cáceres

Friday, 8 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) Luke Barnes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) stuller
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Rouslan Solomakhin
• [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler

Thursday, 7 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres

Wednesday, 6 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Zouhir ⚡️
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes

Tuesday, 5 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs

Monday, 4 March 2019

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Adrian Hope-Bailie
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) Danyao Wang
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) aestes
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add phonetic name as one of `PaymentAddress` properties (#837) Marcos Cáceres

Saturday, 2 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) pes

Friday, 1 March 2019

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Rouslan Solomakhin
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) Nick Doty
• [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) ianbjacobs
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) Samuel Weiler

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2019 15:45:04 UTC