- From: Rouslan Solomakhin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 09:05:00 -0800
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 17:05:22 UTC
@snyderp wrote: > I suggest adding an additional exception type, or return value to the canMakePayment promise indicating "user is still interested in Web Payments, but no background / passive checking, to maximize use of Web Payments API. Thoughts? I like this idea. Our current behavior in this case is to return "false" in `canMakePayment()`, but a different error message would definitely be useful. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/843#issuecomment-469764651
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 17:05:22 UTC