Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335)

> I would not recommend that we do anything that sophisticated until we have a much better 
> understanding of the use case and how widespread it is or is likely to be. In short: I would not
> recommend that we think about changing Payment Request until we have more experience 
> with this.

I wouldn't recommend it either! We need to manage scope on this and realize none of us are Neil Armstrong here when it comes to disbursements, so let's all be humble enough to not re-invent the wheel?

Just been looking for similar existing disbursement functionality and sure enough [great minds think  alike](https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/payments.payouts-batch/v1/) :-)

Look, I have no interest in PapPal, I don't have a PayPal account, and first visited their Web Site last week. Having said that they're clearly ahead of the game and the pack! Just give them the PayPal IDs and amounts and it's done. They could have a POC up and running in a week!

Up to you guys if you need a new/additional Payment Method or whether the mere presence of the Disbursement object suffices to identify a Payout txn.

 Let's go!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-handler/issues/335#issuecomment-475116444

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2019 05:24:06 UTC