- From: Rouslan Solomakhin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 09:01:06 -0800
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 17:01:27 UTC
@snyderp : Which part of the spec differs among the implementations? From https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/#canmakepayment-method : > If the user agent has a payment handler that supports handling payment requests for identifier, resolve hasHandlerPromise with true and terminate this algorithm. Firefox has a built-in payment handler for "basic-card", so they will always return "true". @marcoscaceres, correct me if I'm wrong. So Firefox implementation seems to match to spec, right? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/843#issuecomment-469762954
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 17:01:27 UTC