public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from March 2019 by author

Adrian Hope-Bailie

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 4 March)

aestes

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Monday, 4 March)

alexavena72

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Tracked And not a Joke (#68) (Saturday, 9 March)

asmusf

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 18 March)

chaals

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)

Danyao Wang

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Give AddressInit's members defaults (#852) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Monday, 4 March)

David Chadwick

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Sunday, 24 March)

Denis Ah-Kang

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) (Thursday, 14 March)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Tuesday, 5 March)

ianbjacobs

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should it be possible to provide "total" amounts in more than one currency (#3) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] A distinct invoice address should be supported (#550) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] A distinct invoice address should be supported (#550) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 11 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Tracked And not a Joke (#68) (Saturday, 9 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)

ktmitton

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Shipping Address Validation - Suggest Alternate Address (#537) (Monday, 18 March)

Lucas Verra

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] from a consumer POV (#76) (Sunday, 31 March)

Luke Barnes

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Friday, 8 March)

Marcos Cáceres

• [w3c/payment-request] Set [[waitForUpdate]] to true on dispatch of payerdetailchange (#857) (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) (Saturday, 30 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) (Saturday, 30 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: fix abbriviations (#74) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-id] chore(ECHIDNA): use & instead of ; (#61) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-id] Cr echidna (#60) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Monday, 25 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] fix: dispatch must set [[waitForUpdate]] to true (#855) (Monday, 25 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] [[waitForUpdate]] must be set to true always after dispatch. (#854) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) (Monday, 25 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Support for fine-grained request for billing information (#72) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Sunday, 24 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Refactor: set defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define "last one wins" approach when Basic Card modifiers are equivalent (#60) (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Saturday, 23 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] fix: give AddressInit members defaults (#852) (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Chore: unleash ReSpec xrefs (#851) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Chore: unleash ReSpec xrefs (#851) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] respec no longer supports the old ";" delimiter (#70) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protection to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Last one wins (#69) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add PaymentRequest.prototype.hasEnrolledInstrument() (#833) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] Redact dependentLocality from shippingAddress (#846) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) (Monday, 4 March)
• [w3c/payment-request] editorial: rework PaymentDetailsUpdate.error member (#845) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: error is not well introduced (#840) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Section 3 sentence very hard to read (#839) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: expand upon redactList (#841) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add phonetic name as one of `PaymentAddress` properties (#837) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)

Martin Dürst

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 19 March)

Matt Saxon

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Change of approach for gesture to invoke Payment Sheet (#834) (Wednesday, 27 March)

Nick Doty

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)

Nick Telford-Reed

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Tuesday, 26 March)

pes

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Saturday, 2 March)

richardPAG

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 11 March)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Set BasicCardResponse defaults in IDL, not in prose (#73) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Move PaymentAddress string defaults to AddressInit (#853) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Define how to show and apply modifiers (#71) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Working example/demo Web Payment App (#336) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] WIP: Last wins (#71) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add privacy protenction to MerchantValidationEvent's validationURL (#850) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Describe privacy inplications of changing payment method (#849) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] [Editorial] Adjustments to definitions of payment method and payment method provider (#848) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] "Middleman Id/Commission %/Payeeer" provision (#335) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Fine-grained error reporting with canMakePayment() (#847) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Redact addressLine and dependentLocality from billingAddress (#67) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Add regionCode attribute to PaymentAddress (#836) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Could JIT be used to track users? (#334) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Friday, 1 March)

Samuel Weiler

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes stemming from privacy review (#856) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Richer negotiation re: address redaction? (#842) (Friday, 1 March)

stuller

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Not able to add shipping options dynamically for apple pay (#778) (Friday, 8 March)

Wonsuk Lee

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Editorial: Fix wrong interface name and links (#75) (Saturday, 30 March)

Zouhir ⚡️

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Changes resulting from 28 February PING privacy review (#843) (Wednesday, 6 March)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2019 15:45:04 UTC