public-webappsec@w3.org from February 2016 by date

Monday, 29 February 2016

• Re: Using client certificates for signing Ángel González

Friday, 26 February 2016

• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar

Thursday, 25 February 2016

• Re: Using client certificates for signing Ángel González
• RE: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Crispin Cowan
• RE: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Eduardo' Vela\
• RE: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Crispin Cowan
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Mitar
• RE: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Crispin Cowan
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Ángel González

Wednesday, 24 February 2016

• Re: Teleconference Agenda 2016-Feb-24 Wendy Seltzer
• Teleconference Agenda 2016-Feb-24 Daniel Veditz
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Daniel Veditz
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Mike West
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Ahmed Saleh
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Daniel Veditz
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Anders Rundgren
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• RE: Using client certificates for signing Crispin Cowan
• RE: Using client certificates for signing Crispin Cowan
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Eric Mill

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

• Re: Using client certificates for signing Henry Story
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Martin Thomson
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Anders Rundgren
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Henry Story
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Anders Rundgren
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Anders Rundgren
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Anders Rundgren
• Re: Using client certificates for signing Martin Thomson

Monday, 22 February 2016

• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Mitar
• Using client certificates for signing Mitar
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Brad Hill
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Bil Corry
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Brad Hill
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Brad Hill
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Bil Corry
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Dan Kaminsky
• Re: [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Brad Hill

Wednesday, 17 February 2016

• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Mike West
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Mike West
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Artur Janc
• Re: new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Craig Francis
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Conrad Irwin
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Artur Janc
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Artur Janc

Tuesday, 16 February 2016

• Re: [CSP] "sri" source expression to enforce SRI Patrick Toomey
• new meta tags to protect code visibility or immuatbility Ahmed Saleh

Saturday, 13 February 2016

• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Artur Janc

Monday, 15 February 2016

• Embedded Enforcement and Cookie Controls Mike O'Neill
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Conrad Irwin

Sunday, 14 February 2016

• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Martin Thomson
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Devdatta Akhawe

Saturday, 13 February 2016

• [UI Security] iframe URL indicator Bil Corry
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Mike West
• Re: Making it easier to deploy CSP. Devdatta Akhawe

Friday, 12 February 2016

• Re: FYI: RFC7762 established a registry of CSP directives Richard Barnes
• Re: FYI: RFC7762 established a registry of CSP directives Brad Hill
• Making it easier to deploy CSP. Mike West
• FYI: RFC7762 established a registry of CSP directives Mike West
• Towards a minimum-viable credential management API. Mike West

Thursday, 11 February 2016

• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? David Ross

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

• Re: [CSP] "sri" source expression to enforce SRI Frederik Braun
• [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda 2016-Feb-10 Daniel Veditz

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

• Re: [CSP] "sri" source expression to enforce SRI Craig Francis
• Re: [CSP] "sri" source expression to enforce SRI Patrick Toomey
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Frederik Braun

Monday, 8 February 2016

• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Devdatta Akhawe
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Jim Manico
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Craig Francis
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Devdatta Akhawe
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Michal Zalewski
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Jim Manico
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Jim Manico
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Chris Palmer
• Re: In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Craig Francis
• In-browser sanitization first, "Safe Node" later? Frederik Braun

Sunday, 7 February 2016

• Re: [suborigins] Issues on GitHub Joel Weinberger

Saturday, 6 February 2016

• Re: Proposal to add a browsing context named "_private" Utkarsh Upadhyay
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure 0h3rr3r4@gmail.com
• Re: Proposal to add a browsing context named "_private" Tanvi Vyas

Friday, 5 February 2016

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure Mark Watson

Thursday, 4 February 2016

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure 0h3rr3r4@gmail.com

Friday, 5 February 2016

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure Omar Herrera Reyna
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure Eitan Adler

Thursday, 4 February 2016

• Re: [suborigins] Accessing workers from suborigins Devdatta Akhawe

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

• Re: [suborigins] Accessing workers from suborigins Mitar
• Re: [suborigins] Accessing workers from suborigins Göran AP Eriksson
• Re: [suborigins] Accessing workers from suborigins Devdatta Akhawe
• [suborigins] Accessing workers from suborigins Mitar
• [suborigins] Issues on GitHub Mitar
• Re: CSP header protection Xiaoyin Liu
• Re: CSP header protection Frederik Braun
• CSP header protection Kepeng Li

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Mike West
• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Richard Barnes
• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [referrer] Should referrer policy change value of the Origin header? Jochen Eisinger
• Re: [referrer] Should referrer policy change value of the Origin header? Brad Hill
• Re: [referrer] Should referrer policy change value of the Origin header? Mike West
• [referrer] Should referrer policy change value of the Origin header? Brad Hill
• Re: [webappsec] Face to Face meeting survey Brad Hill

Monday, 1 February 2016

• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Eric Mill
• Re: HSTS priming vs preloading Richard Barnes
• RE: HSTS priming vs preloading Ben Wilson
• Review of WebRTC 1.0 from Web Application Security Working Group Stefan Håkansson LK

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 22:45:26 UTC