Indeed. Happy to see W3C specs making use of IANA for extensibility. On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > Yay! > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:08 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > >> Hello, folks! >> >> We're moving towards a more modular future for CSP; as opposed to putting >> everything into one monolithic doc that advances as a block, we're >> splitting things up into various docs that can advance at their own rate. >> >> Thanks to mnot@ and others, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7762 >> formalizes this split to some extent, providing a single location ( >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/content-security-policy-directives/content-security-policy-directives.xhtml#directives) that >> collects all the directives that we (and others!) end up specifying. I'll >> be adding super-exciting IANA sections to the various CSP modules we have >> lying around, and I hope you'll do the same when you decide that you'd like >> to specify your own directive(s). >> >> Thanks! >> >> -mike >> >
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 22:02:08 UTC