public-vocabs@w3.org from February 2012 by date

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

• Re: Comment versus UserComments Daniel Dulitz
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Thad Guidry
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Jean Delahousse
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Dan Brickley
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Dan Brickley
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Dan Brickley
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Jason Douglas
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks Dan Brickley
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Will Norris
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Dan Brickley
• Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Will Norris
• Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Adrian Giurca
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Martin Hepp

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

• Submission of draft education terms (LRMI) for discussion Greg Grossmeier

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Adrian Giurca

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Henry Andrews
• Re: Submission of draft education terms (LRMI) for discussion Dan Brickley
• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? Dan Brickley
• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? Adrian Giurca
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Adrian Giurca
• ANN: Free GoodRelations / Google Rich Snippets Module for xt:Commerce released Martin Hepp

Monday, 27 February 2012

• Re: How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? Martin Hepp
• How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? Chuck
• Use of Schema.org Dorothy Ng
• excerpt for BlogPosting Yoran Brondsema
• Re: Project vocabulary Bob Ferris
• Re: Project vocabulary Thad Guidry
• Re: Project vocabulary Danny Ayers
• Re: Project vocabulary' Dan Brickley
• Re: Project vocabulary Danny Ayers
• RE: Project vocabulary Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: Project vocabulary Dan Brickley
• Re: Project vocabulary Bernard Vatant
• Re: Project vocabulary Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Two questions about itemprop Jason Douglas
• Re: Two questions about itemprop Jason Ronallo

Sunday, 26 February 2012

• Re: [untitled comments on Comics schemas] Henry Andrews
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Henry Andrews

Saturday, 25 February 2012

• How to add license information to a CreativeWork? / How to mark obscured informations? Chuck
• Two questions about itemprop Chuck

Sunday, 26 February 2012

• RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Olson, Peter
• RE: [untitled comments on Comics schemas] Olson, Peter
• Re: Add a biography property to http://schema.org/Person Jason Ronallo
• Project vocabulary Danny Ayers

Friday, 24 February 2012

• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Kurt Maine
• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Kurt Maine
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Jason Douglas
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Lin Clark
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Will Norris
• table of schema.org proposals now in Web Schemas wiki at W3C Dan Brickley
• Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org Michael Hausenblas
• RE: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Re: One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution Aaron Bradley
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Lin Clark
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Lin Clark
• Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Dan Brickley
• proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event Dan Brickley
• Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) Lin Clark
• SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org Dan Brickley
• Re: One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution Ziarek, Nathan
• doap:Project versus CreativeWork Adrian Giurca
• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Alexander Shubin
• One Book with many offers (was Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title) - a tested solution Adrian Giurca
• Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title Adrian Giurca
• RE: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title Ziarek, Nathan

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks Daniel Dulitz
• Re: metadata about relationships Daniel Dulitz
• Re: metadata about relationships Dan Brickley
• Re: Multiple "Products" per page, one product Title Aaron Bradley
• Re: metadata about relationships Jason Douglas
• Re: metadata about relationships Dan Brickley
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks Dan Brickley
• Re: A few general questions about CreativeWork Dan Brickley
• Re: attachments to CreativeWorks Jason Douglas
• Re: metadata about relationships Jason Douglas
• A few general questions about CreativeWork B McGlamery
• A few general questions about CreativeWork B McGlamery
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Henry Andrews
• Re: metadata about relationships Bob Ferris

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

• Web forums Vladimir Panteleev
• Itemtype for tvchannels and package suresh devaraj
• subcribe Palmer, Mark E. Mr.

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Henry Andrews
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Henry Andrews

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

• attachments to CreativeWorks Will Norris
• metadata about relationships Will Norris

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• metadata about relationships Will Norris
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Thad Guidry
• Re: Comment versus UserComments Daniel Dulitz
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Martin Hepp
• Marking micro-blogging status messages? François Daoust
• Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Thad Guidry
• Comics Schema Update and Open Questions Olson, Peter

Monday, 20 February 2012

• Re: Multiple Ratings in one Review Scott Brandley
• Re: Multiple Ratings in one Review Aaron Bradley

Friday, 17 February 2012

• Multiple Ratings in one Review Scott Brandley

Saturday, 18 February 2012

• schema.org content monetization Denis Igin

Friday, 17 February 2012

• Re: Choosing the Appropriate Schema: clinical trials Aaron Brown

Saturday, 18 February 2012

• Add a biography property to http://schema.org/Person Stéphane Corlosquet

Friday, 17 February 2012

• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Alexander Shubin
• RE: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Alexander Shubin
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Dan Brickley
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Ivan Herman
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Ivan Herman
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") John Erickson
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Martin Hepp
• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times jean delahousse KC

Thursday, 16 February 2012

• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times Kooteo
• Re: Schema.org Required Properties (Was "Re: Issue with rich snippets tools testing tool & businessEvent") Jocelyn Fournier
• Re: rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times Guha
• rNews, Schema.org and The New York Times Sandhaus, Evan

Tuesday, 14 February 2012

• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? jean delahousse KC
• Re: Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked Aaron Bradley
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? Aaron Bradley

Monday, 13 February 2012

• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Jack Miller
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? jean delahousse
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Jesse Friedman
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? Adrian Giurca
• Re: Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? Thad Guidry
• Re: Describing several video in the same page Dan Brickley
• Re: Describing several video in the same page Adrian Giurca
• Richer information in the microdata than in the visible content in the HTML page: what is the good practice ? jean delahousse
• Describing several video in the same page jean delahousse

Sunday, 12 February 2012

• Choosing the Appropriate Schema: clinical trials Elliot Cohen

Friday, 10 February 2012

• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Kurt Maine
• RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Leonardo Picado
• Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org] Kurt Maine
• Re: Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked Gunnar Bittersmann

Thursday, 9 February 2012

• Breadcrumbs: Last Item Not Hyperlinked Irfanullah Jan

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Schema for Transport Data Christian Bäuerlein
• Re: Schema for Transport Data Martin Hepp

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Schema for Transport Data Christian Bäuerlein

Monday, 6 February 2012

• Multilinguality and schema.org Bernard Vatant
• RE: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) Olson, Peter

Sunday, 5 February 2012

• RE: Periodical Schema & Scholarly Journals [formerly Process Question] Olson, Peter

Friday, 3 February 2012

• Re: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) Thad Guidry

Thursday, 2 February 2012

• RE: Comics Schema Draft (formerly Process Question) Olson, Peter
• Re: Process Question Dan Brickley
• Re: Product type Tim van Oostrom
• Re: Product type Robert Schroeder
• Re: Process Question Thad Guidry
• Re: Product type Tim van Oostrom
• Re: Product type Robert Schroeder
• Re: Product type Martin Hepp
• Re: Product type Tim van Oostrom
• Product type Robert Schroeder
• RE: Process Question Olson, Peter

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

• Re: Process Question Dan Brickley
• Re: Process Question Guha
• RE: Process Question Olson, Peter
• Re: Error in example at http://schema.org/Movie Dan Brickley

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:54:33 UTC