- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:50:58 +0100
- To: Guha <guha@google.com>, "Olson, Peter" <polson@marvel.com>, public-vocabs@w3.org
On 1 February 2012 19:44, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote: > > The most important thing to do is to get traction (in terms of > discussions, consensus, publisher support) from the community. After that, it is easy. Yes. I think we should also try to take care to get some non-English language examples with each proposal. Japanese was mentioned here and that would be great. Peter - feel free to use our area of the W3C Wiki to keep drafts and proposals - http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas - or at least link them for others to find. As Guha says, schema.org isn't very formalist regarding review. But the more consensus we see around a proposal, the more sensible it seems to us to adopt it. cheers, Dan > guha > > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Olson, Peter <polson@marvel.com> wrote: >> >> Hi List – >> >> A few weeks ago I submitted the Marvel draft for several schema pertaining >> to comics. We were wondering what the process is for the consideration and >> adoption of new schemas once they are submitted. Basically, should we just >> start to evangelize and get comments from the wider comics industry or >> should we wait for a more formal review from schema.org? Apologies if this >> is answered somewhere else – we just couldn’t find it. >> >> -peter >> >> Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:51:26 UTC