Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions

I like this extension idea.  As much as I'd like to have comics.org's IDs take over the comics world, it's better to allow many and let users sort out what's most useful.  There are already quite a few sites using comics.org issue IDs so we've already got a foothold anyway :-)

thanks,
-henry



>________________________________
> From: "Olson, Peter" <polson@marvel.com>
>To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>; public-vocabs@w3.org 
>Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:13 PM
>Subject: RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions
> 
>
>RE: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions 
>Hey -
>
>Ok a nuts-and-bolts question.  I'm going to update the spec to remove some of the localized IDs in favor of doing the extension stuff you mentioned below.  Generally for an extended property (e.g.  <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID" itemtype="http://schema.marvel.com/OurID">) does there need to be an actual page at the URL or does the URI just need to be unique?
>
>-peter
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tue 2/21/2012 9:38 PM
>To: public-vocabs@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Comics Schema Update and Open Questions
>
>>
>> What qualifies as ubiquitous enough to be included as an identifier in a schema such as this one?  Is it better to include more (with fewer actually used) or fewer (but more frequently populated)?
>>
>> -       Peter
>>
>> Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment
>>
>>
>
>I think it would be advantageous to allow as many productID's as
>possible when the need arises.  Linked Data availability or not.
>
>For example, perhaps just extending Schema.org productID to suit ? or
>extending with Good Relations ?
>
><div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">
>  <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID"
>itemtype="http://ComicsForCheap.com/OurID">123-444-321</span>
>
>or
>
><meta itemprop='productID' content='OurID:123-444-321'/>
>
>Interestingly, I did not find a "generic" productID while looking
>through Good Relations other than a gr:BusinessEntity gr:owns a
>gr:individual gr:ProductorService that has a gr:serialNumber as such
>http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#serialNumber
>
>So perhaps internal productID's in the case of Comic Issues could also
>use their own gr:serialNumber ??  But I think there is a need to not
>mix the 2 notions of a productID and a serialNumber.  Forewarning :)
>
>--
>-Thad
>http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
>
>
> 
>******************************************************************************
>Nothing contained in this e-mail shall (a) be considered a legally binding agreement, amendment or modification of any agreement with Marvel, each of which requires a fully executed agreement to be received by Marvel or (b) be deemed approval of any product, packaging, advertising or promotion material, which may only come from Marvel's Legal Department.
>******************************************************************************
>THINK GREEN - SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!
> 
> 
>
>