- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:38:39 -0600
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
> > What qualifies as ubiquitous enough to be included as an identifier in a schema such as this one? Is it better to include more (with fewer actually used) or fewer (but more frequently populated)? > > - Peter > > Peter Olson | VP, Web and Application Development | Marvel Entertainment > > I think it would be advantageous to allow as many productID's as possible when the need arises. Linked Data availability or not. For example, perhaps just extending Schema.org productID to suit ? or extending with Good Relations ? <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product"> <span itemprop="productID" itemtype="http://schema.org/productID" itemtype="http://ComicsForCheap.com/OurID">123-444-321</span> or <meta itemprop='productID' content='OurID:123-444-321'/> Interestingly, I did not find a "generic" productID while looking through Good Relations other than a gr:BusinessEntity gr:owns a gr:individual gr:ProductorService that has a gr:serialNumber as such http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#serialNumber So perhaps internal productID's in the case of Comic Issues could also use their own gr:serialNumber ?? But I think there is a need to not mix the 2 notions of a productID and a serialNumber. Forewarning :) -- -Thad http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 02:39:07 UTC