- From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:27:09 -0800
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACWrOGYASSGsQR8Fg6FYsiT8w7OgP-aQTFf0N=uA9uFJgQVmEg@mail.gmail.com>
I just wanted to follow up on this. I like the ideas mentioned here... seeing no further debate can we close on a new Comment type? :-) On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 18:02, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for these thoughtful comments. I also like that proposed direction > for Comment. > > How about a play of a video, or a favorite of an object, and the other > non-comment UserInteractions? Do you have any thoughts there? > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> ... >> >>> Can we get a couple of sample real-world pages that can guide our >>> decisions here? Stéphane - do you have something from Drupal 7 maybe? >>> >> >> You can look at the comments of any Drupal 7 site, for example [1]<http://goo.gl/KZShd>. >> I took the markup of that comment and stripped it down to highlight the >> relevant type and properties we use: >> >> <div typeof="sioct:Comment"> >> <span rel="sioc:has_creator"><a typeof="schema:Person" >> property="schema:name" rel="foaf:page" href="http://lin-clark.com">Lin >> Clark</a></span> >> <span property="dc:date" content="2011-10-01T10:12:00+02:00" >> datatype="xsd:dateTime">Sat, 01/10/2011 - 10:12</span> >> <h3 property="dc:title">Wow, big news!</h3> >> <span rel="sioc:reply_of" >> resource="/blog/2011/09/30/schemaorg-rich-snippets-drupal-7-rdfa"></span> >> <div property="content:encoded">Wow, big news!. It also looks like >> Google might have fixed their RDFa parser? It doesn't seem like you are >> using Rich Snippets module to change the placement of the image's rel >> attribute, which was required before to get the image to show up. This is >> great because I'm planning on doing a project that aggregates content from >> Drupal sites and uses the Schema.org vocabulary to model things... and now >> people can do it in either RDFa or microdata and still get the SEO benefit >> from it.</div> >> </div> >> >> Except for the missing schema.org Comment type, some of the properties >> used above have an equivalent at http://schema.org/CreativeWork: >> sioc:has_creator => author >> dc:date => dateCreated >> dc:title => name >> >> A comment body property should be created for the Comment type (I guess >> it would be called commentBody following the same convention as articleBody >> for the type Article). >> >> sioc:reply_of is used to link to the post the comment is replying to. >> Looking at http://schema.org/CreativeWork it seems the comment property >> could be used to link an article to its comments, but this needs to be >> clarified wrt to UserComments and UserInteraction (already mentioned in >> this thread). The type Comment could also define a property to refer to the >> post it replies to, such as 'repliesTo' or 'parentItem' (Review >> defines itemReviewed for example). This property would be equivalent to >> sioc:reply_of. Drupal 7 also use the same sioc:reply_of property to link to >> the parent comment in the case of threaded discussions. >> >> Steph. >> >> [1] http://goo.gl/KZShd >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 20:28:00 UTC