- From: Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:05:01 -0800
- To: public-vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJqAn3xoBQQJ4TxfmmG5iqxhFz6hB2Czwoj-BPVehKeKYryu+w@mail.gmail.com>
(2nd attempt at sending, hopefully not a duplicate) In general, schema.org (or microdata in general?) seems to lack the ability to specify metadata for the relationship between items. I'm curious if there is a general pattern for how this data should be modeled. First a concrete example. The Person type describes an individual person, and the EducationalOrganization type describes an actual education institution. The 'alumniOf' property defines the existence of a relationship between a Person and an EducationalOrganization, but there is nowhere to provide additional metadata about that relationship. Things like graduation year, field of study, etc. Similarly for work information defined by either 'worksFor' or the more general 'affiliation'. I know there has been discussion of including a CV schema which would likely address these specific examples, but this seems to be a more general problem with RDF style triples. There's plenty of space to exhaustively define the subject and object, but no room to provide metadata around the predicate. How is this type of thing handled in general? And more specifically, how should it be handled in the above examples? We include this metadata in Google+ profiles, and are able to include it cleanly in Portable Contacts, but I don't see how to represent it in schema.org. -will
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 08:08:23 UTC