- From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:07:21 +0100
- To: Henry Andrews <hha1@cornell.edu>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F4DDCB9.9060804@tu-cottbus.de>
Hello Henry, I would say space will be the token separator :) (a bad result) But, in this context, the main problem is not how to extract triples but what content creators really do. I am confident that a non-trivial schema processor (extractor) will do more than simple DOM parsing. -Adrian Giurca On 2/28/2012 7:56 PM, Henry Andrews wrote: > With the caveat that I'm new here and probably don't know what I'm > talking about, this plural/list usage does not look like a good idea, > as it requires anyone who wants to make use of the data to understand > that it needs to parse and split on the comma. Which is easy enough > in this example but can become very complex in terms of quoting and > escaping, at which point people are likely to write things improperly > quoted/escaped making the data worthless. It's much much easier to > say that all formatting/parsing should be handled by the actual markup > syntax (in this case HTML) and values are treated as-is. > > I guess this would make for more verbose HTML markup as you'd need to > wrap each OS in a <span itemprop="operatingSystem"></span>, but I > think it's much more clean. > > thanks, > -henry > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de> > *Subject:* Re: Schema.org property cardinality and use of plural > (WAS Re: SoftwareApplication proposal for schema.org) > > When Text is expected I would say that both string and distinct > markup should be allowed. Asa such the below may work too: > <div itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/SoftwareApplication"> > <p itemprop="operatingSystems">OSX 10.6, Windows 7</p> > ... > </div> > > and a potential Schema processor should be advised. Of course, > this can solved much better by introducing cardinalities on > Schema.org <http://Schema.org> > Introducing cardinalities will not put any pressure on possible > existent Schema.org consumers. > However, one should be advised that object oriented software > design has a long tradition on using plural to introduce > collections of things. > > -Adrian Giurca > -- - Adrian /Follow Me on Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/giurca> Connect on Linkedin <http://de.linkedin.com/in/adriangiurca> /
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 08:08:23 UTC