public-sml@w3.org from February 2008: by thread

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 29 February)

xlink vs sml:URI zamp\@libero\.it (Wednesday, 27 February)

sml:ref vs xlink zamp\@libero\.it (Wednesday, 27 February)

Re: sml:ref vs xlink Sandy Gao (Thursday, 28 February)

[Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 27 February)

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 27 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-21 SML Teleconference Kumar Pandit (Tuesday, 26 February)

[Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 22 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 22 February)

[Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 22 February)

[Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 22 February)

[Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 22 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-22 SML Telecon John Arwe (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not? Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 21 February)

RE: [SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not? Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

Potential discussion topic Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-21 SML Telecon John Arwe (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Wednesday, 20 February)
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 20 February)
  - RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 20 February)
    - RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 20 February)
      - RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

Feb 14 meeting minutes Valentina Popescu (Wednesday, 20 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-14 SML Telecon John Arwe (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 20 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

[Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 18 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 17 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 16 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 15 February)

[Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 15 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 14 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-14 SML Teleconference John Arwe (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 February)

[Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 12 February)

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 12 February)

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 12 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 12 February)

Please review LC drafts Pratul Dublish (Tuesday, 12 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-07 SML Teleconference Lynn, James (HP Software) (Tuesday, 12 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 8 February)

Re: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? Sandy Gao (Friday, 8 February)
- RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? Pratul Dublish (Friday, 8 February)
  - RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? Sandy Gao (Friday, 8 February)
    - RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? Pratul Dublish (Friday, 8 February)

[Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

Regrets for today Zulah Eckert (Thursday, 7 February)

regrets for today's meeting Valentina Popescu (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

FW: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-07 SML Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 7 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 7 February)

Re: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative Sandy Gao (Thursday, 7 February)
- RE: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 7 February)

[Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

[Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 6 February)

RE: [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Monday, 4 February)

RE: [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" Lynn, James (HP Software) (Tuesday, 5 February)

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)

[Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 3 February)

RE: [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Monday, 4 February)

[Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 3 February)

[Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 2 February)

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 2 February)

[Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 2 February)

[Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 2 February)

[Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Friday, 1 February)

RE: [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando Wilson, Kirk D (Monday, 4 February)

[Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5428] unclear passages bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

[Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 1 February)

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 17:57:33 UTC