- From: zamp\@libero\.it <zamp@libero.it>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:00:00 +0100
- To: "public-sml" <public-sml@w3.org>
I All,
recently I have read SML specification and in particular sml reference me=
chanism in XML instance document. However I don't understand the reason o=
f introducing a new mechanism instead of using xlink.
Are there some advantages in using sml:ref?
If yes...which ones?
That is to say...about this example:
<EnrolledCourse sml:ref=3D"true">
<Name>PHY101</Name>
<Grade>A</Grade>
<sml:uri> http://www.university.example.org/Universities/MIT/Cour=
ses.xml
#xmlns(u=3Dhttp://www.university.example.org/ns)
xpointer(/u:Courses/u:Course[u:Name=3D'PHY101'])
</sml:uri>
</EnrolledCourse>
Why not like that?
<EnrolledCourse>
<Name>PHY101</Name>
<Grade>A</Grade>
<environment xmlns:xlink=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xlink:type=3D"extended">
<course xlink:type=3D"locator" xlink:label=3D"course"
xlink:href=3D"http://www.university.example.org/Universities/MIT/Courses.=
xml
#xmlns(u=3Dhttp://www.university.example.org/ns) xpointer(/u:Co=
urses/u:Course[u:Name=3D'PHY101'])"/>
</enviroment>
</EnrolledCourse>
Best regards..
Travis
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:50:20 UTC