- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:09:25 -0800
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- CC: Pratul Dublish <PRATULD@microsoft.com>, Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <0E4B701746DBB9418A6747852F8B9CA1382EB16FD2@NA-EXMSG-W602.wingroup.windeploy.ntd>
Pratul is still having problems with his email (he cannot send to public-sml).
I am sending the agenda for tomorrow's meeting on Pratul's behalf.
From: Pratul Dublish
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:52 PM
To: Kumar Pandit
Subject: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-07 SML
Valentina->Jordan->Jim, it appears you may be scribing this week.
Chair: when sending out an agenda, use following format
[w3c sml][agenda] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([agenda]
agreed to, rest chair's convention)
Chair: when sending out an updated agenda, use following format, "n" =
update number, 1st update == 2, etc.
[w3c sml][agenda][ver n] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([agenda]
[ver n] agreed to, rest chair's convention)
Scribe: read entire agenda, I restructured it so your "to do"s around the
scribe list are time-sequenced
i.e. less to remember
The phone number to use for the SML WG teleconference is documented on the
WG's administrative home page:
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#phone
Participants are invited to join IRC channel, as documented on the WG's
administrative home page:
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#irc
Teleconference Time and Length (two hours)
Pacific 11 AM - 1 PM
Mountain 12 PM - 2 PM
Central 1 PM - 3 PM
Eastern 2 PM - 4 PM
UK 7 PM - 9 PM
Paris 8 PM - 10 PM
Upcoming publication moratoria:
* 15 April 2008: Deadline for publication requests
before moratorium [12pm ET]
* 17 April: Last publications before moratorium
* 20 - 27 April: No publications
- 20-22 April 2008: AC meeting in Beijing
- 21-25 April 2008: WWW 2008
* 28 April: Publications resume.
Proposed Agenda:
1. Roll call (present/regrets/absent)
2. Selection of Scribe based on list below
New scribes see:
- Scribe Quick Start Guide
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
- Scribe FAQ
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html
- Instructions (steps "n-...") at the end of this agenda for reviewing
and sending out minutes
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending
2007-08-30 Lipton, Paul until mid-January 2007
2008-01-10 Valentina Popescu
2008-01-17 Boucher, Jordan
2008-01-21 Lynn, James
2008-01-21 Gao, Sandy
2008-01-22 Wilson, Kirk
2008-01-22 Eckert, Zulah
2008-01-23 Smith, Virginia
2008-01-30 Kumar, Pandit
Exempt Arwe, John
Exempt Dublish, Pratul
Exempt MSM
Exempt PH
3. Approval of minutes from previous meeting(s):
- 1/31
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Feb/att-0042/20080131-sml-minutes.html
4. "from the CG"
- June F2F likely in Edinburgh, UK. Please respond to John's email with your preference for location (Edinburgh/US) and dates
5. Discuss and agree on the target date for publishing the LC
6. Review hasProposal bugs
5402<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5402>
hasProposal
Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ...
5403<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5403>
hasProposal
Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
5405<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5405>
hasProposal
Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents
5408<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5408>
hasProposal
Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
5438<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5438>
hasProposal
confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
5447<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5447>
hasProposal
Model validation term defined twice
5451<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5451>
hasProposal
acknowledge past contributors
7. Review needsAgreement bugs
5406<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5406>
needsAgreement
Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
5417<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5417>
needsAgreement
inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
5418<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5418>
needsAgreement, needsReview
conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
8. Review needsReview bugs
4675<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675>
needsReview
add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and p...
4992<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4992>
needsReview
Object identity needs to be clarified
5063<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5063>
needsReview
Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
5064<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5064>
needsReview
On which component(s) are SML reference constraints speci...
5181<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5181>
needsReview
xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
5388<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5388>
needsReview
Definition of "Reference"
5395<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5395>
needsReview
Normative discussion of schemaComplete
5398<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5398>
needsReview
SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
5400<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5400>
needsReview
Clarification of deref() needed
5410<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5410>
needsReview
Repeating schematron specification contents
5416<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5416>
needsReview
clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
5424<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5424>
needsReview
4. SML References awkward wording
5429<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5429>
needsReview
minor(?) corrections
5430<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5430>
needsReview
Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language...
5437<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5437>
needsReview
5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
5450<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5450>
needsReview
register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry
n-3. Scribe: update scribe list below in this meeting's minutes, for use
in the next meeting's agenda:
Update the list below and sort it (LRU), leaving people who will be out
for an extended period near the bottom
to keep the names of draftees for the current meeting near the top, so
when the next agenda goes out people
will know if their name is at or near the top of the list to scribe
next.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending
2007-08-30 Lipton, Paul until mid-January 2007
2008-01-03 Kumar, Pandit
2008-01-10 Valentina Popescu
2008-01-17 Boucher, Jordan
2008-01-21 Lynn, James
2008-01-21 Gao, Sandy
2008-01-22 Wilson, Kirk
2008-01-22 Eckert, Zulah
2008-01-23 Smith, Virginia
Exempt Arwe, John
Exempt Dublish, Pratul
Exempt MSM
Exempt PH
n-2. Scribe: follow the steps in the Scribe Quick Start Guide through
"Generate minutes"
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Also issue the command "rrsagent, make log public" since we are a
public workgroup.
DO NOT use tools that significantly change the source html, like Word,
to do your editing.
Those tools make compare tools to sanity check the scribe's edits
unusable even though it
renders fine visually (even here, some like Word remove W3C style
sheets so it renders
with subtle differences).
n-1. Scribe: (optional, but most often followed)
Send the original and updated minutes to the meeting chair as an
editorial check before
sending to the full list. Assume the chair will use a compare tool.
n. Scribe: send the minutes to the public mailing list
After the meeting, follow the conventions we have agreed on within the
wg to help
people search the email archives more effectively, namely:
[w3c sml][minutes] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([minutes]
agreed to, rest chair's convention)
As with agendas, if minutes are updated include a [ver n] "tag" as well.
----
n+1. Chair
After meeting, update good standing list
Thanks!
Pratul
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:15:53 UTC