public-sml@w3.org from February 2008 by subject

[Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme

[Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?

[Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"

[Bug 5306] SML-IF header information

[Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"

[Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete

[Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications

[Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed

[Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"

[Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"

[Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents

[Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"

[Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers

[Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative

[Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification

[Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents

[Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition

[Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents

[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported

[Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"

[Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not

[Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology

[Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording

[Bug 5428] unclear passages

[Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections

[Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages

[Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute

[Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents

[Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd

[Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation

[Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice

[Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme

[Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors

[Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme

[Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing

[Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?

[Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?

[Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec

[Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion

[Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f

[Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples

[Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec

[Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema

[Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph

[Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long

[Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head

[Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set

[Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title

[Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous'

[Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]

[Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded

[Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute

[Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink

[SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not?

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-07 SML

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-14 SML Teleconference

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-21 SML Telecon

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-22 SML Telecon

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-07 SML Teleconference

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-14 SML Telecon

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-21 SML Teleconference

Feb 14 meeting minutes

Please review LC drafts

Potential discussion topic

Regrets for today

regrets for today's meeting

sml:ref vs xlink

xlink vs sml:URI

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 17:57:33 UTC