Friday, 29 February 2008
Thursday, 28 February 2008
Wednesday, 27 February 2008
- xlink vs sml:URI
- xlink vs sml:URI
- sml:ref vs xlink
- [Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings
- [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
- [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
Tuesday, 26 February 2008
Friday, 22 February 2008
- [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded
- [Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes
- [Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes
- [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head
Thursday, 21 February 2008
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-22 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded
- RE: [SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not?
- [SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not?
- [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous'
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head
- [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous'
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
- [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- Potential discussion topic
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-21 SML Telecon
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-14 SML Telecon
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous'
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- Feb 14 meeting minutes
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title
- [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
- [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
- [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head
- [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph
- [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long
- [Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema
Monday, 18 February 2008
Sunday, 17 February 2008
Saturday, 16 February 2008
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec
- [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec
Friday, 15 February 2008
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples
- [Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples
Thursday, 14 February 2008
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents
- [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme
- [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry
- [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme
- [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry
- [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f
- [Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion
- [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
Wednesday, 13 February 2008
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-14 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
Tuesday, 12 February 2008
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- Please review LC drafts
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-07 SML Teleconference
Friday, 8 February 2008
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- Re: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
Thursday, 7 February 2008
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice
- [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
- [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
- [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold?
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing
- [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference?
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing
- [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors
- [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents
- [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme
- RE: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- Regrets for today
- Re: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- regrets for today's meeting
- [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme
- [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme
- FW: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-07 SML
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents
- [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
Wednesday, 6 February 2008
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors
- [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry
- [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry
Tuesday, 5 February 2008
Monday, 4 February 2008
- RE: [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- RE: [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme
- [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- RE: [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando
Sunday, 3 February 2008
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
Saturday, 2 February 2008
- [Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
Friday, 1 February 2008
- [Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5428] unclear passages
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers